On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:05:29 +0000, Charles Lindbergh wrote:
>
> I can appreciate your frustration, but do you really believe your
> government could run things any better? Right now, you are not
> subsidizing these industries with your taxes. If they were still under
> government control, don't you think they would operate at a loss and
> require taxpayer subsidy? If you never took the train, wouldn't you
> resent having to subsidize those who do use them?
>
> Honestly, I can't think of anything that any government runs better than
> private industry, can you?
The British Government still subsidizes the privatized rail service.
In 2013 the rail companies received UKP 4 billion, and paid out 200
million UK pounds to shareholders.
Part of the UK rail system (Northern rail) is part-owned by the a
subsidiary of the Dutch state-owned company Abellio. It's been announced
today that theycompany has won the contract to run Scots Rail from next
April.
The mail service is an example of a government running a better industry
that a private company. As are the armed forces, police service & a
national health service.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 |
|