On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 23:13:45 -0400, Vreejack
<homeless.beggar@internet.crossroads.usa> wrote:
>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 15:39:55 -0400, Spanky The Man
><SpankyTheMan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I know I said I was done with the box-sets (except for a few
>>"accessory" boxes) but, well... why leave the job half finished? So
>>here are those "accessory" boxes.
>
>I knew you were up to something. I went back and started examining
>your original 2nd edition core rules uploads and started wondering how
>to improve them. I set all the file creation dates to their original
>publication date so they can be sorted that way. It's... interesting.
Hold off on those; I may go back to that set and re-work them a bit.
I'll probably repost them "officially" under the TSR Initiative tag
once I'm done.
I like your idea of changing the creation dates to the publication
date though. I'm not actually going to /implement/ it (too much work)
but it's a great idea.
>I think Shaman should be included in that group, by the way. It's an
>official character class and its spells are included in the priest
>compendium.
I can see the merits of that argument although I tend to lump "Shaman"
in with the "Complete Gladiator" and "Complete Spacefarer's"
handbooks, which were such pointless splatbooks that I prefer to
ignore them if I can. I admit that I did quite like how "Shaman" dealt
with spirits however
|
|