sitkaman wrote in news:kdvn7b9s1p9jokp5s5ssvnadk4alag609l@4ax.com:
> And yes, I forgot to mention that the original name on the Doctor Who
> post was the Caballero rename of "Programmed For Pleasure". Maybe I
> should not have renamed it, but it seems simpler to use only the
> original name for various versions of a movie.
Ahh, crap.
My bad.
I failed to look for aka's in your list.
As for name/rename, you can't win for losing. People as dense as I am will
get confused no matter which you choose.
Are there really differences between the two (meaning the movie itself)?
PFP 3,201MB 1:25:53
FO 4,291MB 1:22:17
or are the differences just a function of the authoring?
I certainly don't expect you/anybody to do a side-by-side compare,
but maybe there's a reviewer comment somewhere about cuts....
|
|