For what my suggestion is worth:
Early Seventeen and Video Art Holland productions (end of 80s,
beginning of 90s). Some of it is crap, but some of it is really nice.
There's lots, specially most of the early material has never been
released on DVD.
Many Danish movies with REAL teens (18 & 18+) (roughly same period),
sometimes very natural behaving actors. But please not the German
dubbed stuff...
There's lots more of course. I have never seen any CLASSIC Japanese
(or Chinese) porn. Or Taiwanese or Korean? And how about the Russians?
They have really beautiful women...
How about classic porn from countries where it is forbidden, like
Indonesia, or even the Arab world? There just should be some,
somewhere.
South-American (no fake tits please!) classic? I've never seen that
neither.
I could go on. American classic porn is nice, but there should be so
much more. Therefore it might be a good idea to (slightly) redifine
this group.
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 22:11:44 GMT, mjello <non.compos@ment.is> wrote:
>Now that we're more than 10 years removed from the creation of abdec and
>from the rationale for creating it, the definition of classic may
>warrant re-examination.
>
>The 2004 definition, "films that were produced in the 1970s and 1980s,
>which would be reviewed and referred to by such authors as Jim Holiday,
>Robert Rimmer, Patrick Riley and others," relies on the opinions of
>people who watched the movies on tape or in theaters and as a rule prior
>to 1986. That's more than 30 years ago.
>
>Many people inside and outside the industry think it imploded with, and
>never recovered from, the advent of the VCR. Specifically, the VCR made
>it so easy and so cheap to make movies that little or no movie-making
>skills or investment were required.
>
>If that's so, and there seems to be little question that it is, where do
>we look for post-1985 opinions about what deserves to be called a
>classic after the so-called Golden Age? Maybe "The AVN Guide to the 500
>Greatest Adult Films of All Time" (2005)? Or something else?
>
>Perhaps we just roll our own and nominate individual movies that have
>stood the test of time for particular reasons (e.g., "I think 'Latex'
>belongs here because...").
>
>Or do we just let it stay the way it is?
>
>What do you think?
|
|