alt.binaries.dvd.criterionPrev. Next
Re: REQ: Crimson Canary
() 2010/01/21 00:30

Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!pullnews.sonic-news.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:30:45 -0600
From: x
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.multimedia.vintage-film,alt.binaries.dvd.classic.movies,alt.binaries.multimedia.vintage-film.pre-1960,alt.binaries.movies.classic,alt.binaries.dvd.classics,alt.binaries.dvd.criterion
Subject: Re: REQ: Crimson Canary
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:30:22 -0500
Message-ID: <180gl5tnva8ltcvh2ggee7vv3ppgr14ogv@4ax.com>
References: <200120101832475632%ad@ada.net> <04gfl55u3nok3r43rm6h2rkb6vnr506963@4ax.com> <p1jfl55a9t32fsj7tl75h1jnk7scaf7uj2@4ax.com> <qinfl5h64i6ti5qegofqcg0222b6sq9b4g@4ax.com> <0npfl5d13qgjp7vmhjor4t34s8stmarcqv@4ax.com> <l2sfl55mokqp1j3k2ss1rorkef5j88epd9@4ax.com> <o3tfl5dmps79pd97idbrq9kgd6chucjccj@4ax.com> <puvfl5d1uc8tqhepv244m0rrq657gnjfe0@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 132
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-IYkWyEmycO+jMZiR9xGmjf6iY9jziV2iG64zPX7zvpOZlCxriFly4PMFv9vAdzT/J8ziVEOiPW1AWhU!R3z+x8D8WaW8qyjzdu/YlwRjW3JlwsGCHxCzEHZwap2/H7tnsIe1D2Lv4bb7jBhi3hHm6L4N
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.multimedia.vintage-film:18 alt.binaries.dvd.classic.movies:108 alt.binaries.multimedia.vintage-film.pre-1960:14 alt.binaries.dvd.criterion:3458

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:20:52 -0800, radiotales <radiotales@ether.net>
wrote:

>On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:42:05 -0500, x wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:21:25 -0800, radiotales <radiotales@ether.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:01:12 -0500, x wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:56:43 -0800, radiotales <radiotales@ether.net>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:42:57 -0500, x wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:57:19 -0600, Isis <isis55423@hotpop.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:32:47 -0500, Bebop <ad@ada.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>:Thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Well, I don't have 'The Crimson Canary (1945)'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>><http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0037623/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>but I can post 'The Cardinal (1963)' for you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>><http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056907/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I figure that's about the same thing. Just so we get the Phylum/Class & color
>>>>>>>right.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Btw, do you know what a Criterion is?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>And do you often request DVD's that don't exist?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Just wondering...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Isis
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hey Bebop ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I can post a copy of " The Crimson Canary" over @ ....
>>>>>>
>>>>>>alt.binaries.multimedia.vintage-film.pre-1960.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Look for it posting soon ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>x
>>>>>>
>>>>>Good! Now I don't have to. <g>
>>>>>
>>>>>radiotales..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>uh oh ! ...
>>>>
>>>>maybe I should have waited a bit before volunteering to post the
>>>>request  ...  :-)
>>>>
>>>>Hey Radio ...
>>>>
>>>>is your copy better than the copy I was planning on posting?
>>>>
>>>>Check the screenshots ...
>>>>
>>>>http://goo.gl/ILuN
>>>>
>>>>http://goo.gl/E2zB
>>>>
>>>>http://goo.gl/XNbM
>>>>
>>>>http://goo.gl/aK7t
>>>>
>>>>http://goo.gl/m06S
>>>>
>>>>http://goo.gl/CDtZ
>>>>
>>>>http://goo.gl/ELgU
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>if so I'll gladly turn over the request to you for the better copy ...
>>>>
>>>>you always post good quality vids ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>x
>>>
>>>The one I posted was poor quality, your screen shots look a little
>>>better, I think.
>>>
>>>I usually would not post a low quality print, but the rarity of the
>>>film seemed to justify it at the time. The film has appearances by
>>>Coleman Hawkins,Oscar Pettiford and Josh White.
>>>
>>>I just couldn't let it go.
>>>
>>>radiotales..
>>
>>
>>Surprised to read the copy I got from KG is a little better quality
>>than the copy you have ...
>>
>>the copy from KG is pretty shabby ... :-)
>>
>>I'll go ahead and post the copy I have ...
>>
>>thanks for the info ...
>>
>>x
>>
>I'm going to look at yours, and I'll compare it with what I have.
>From the stills, yours looks better, but stills can be misleading.
>If mine looks any better, I'll post it.
>
>radiotales..


that's true about the stills being misleading ...

if your copy is better than the copy I'm posting, an upgrade post is
most welcome ...

thanks ...

x




Follow-ups:1234567891011121314
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite