On 08 Sep 2009 13:06:10 GMT, JimB0ss (no@spam.org) wrote:
:
:So, just to make sure I got it: the guy who was like a week ago foaming at the mouth and chiding
:others for asking for stuff posted few months ago is now RE-RE-POSTING the stuff that is already
:posted TWICE and WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR AT LEAST A YEAR.
:
:What was that I remember? 'Refrain from asking for stuff posted at least in the last 365 days'?
:
:So instead of just posting a damn NZB to a re-post of the original Skata post that is THREE DAYS
:OLD, our village celebrity decides to post the same movie again. Well, I guess anything to make a
:day go by faster.
:
:Oh how the mighty have fallen.
:
:Pathetic!
:
:J
Hi B0rat!
A willingness on my part to repost one of my own posts that is slightly less
than 365 days old, stands in stark contradistinction to those who would make
that a general practice of requesting such reposts of others.
Furthermore, the age of the post becomes irrelevant when certain NSPs are unable
to retrieve the data resulting from their own technological deficiencies.
While I realize that you and Skata are very close (almost like brothers!), how
can you be so certain that this most recent three-day-old post is in fact a
Criterion, and/or has not been altered to 'Full Screen'?
And as far as "anything to make a day go by faster", at my age I can only wish
for time to pass me by more slowly.
But if YOU need something to pass the time, you might get around to posting the
.PAR2s for 'Branded to Kill'. And as a fun experiment, you might wish to create
them after changing:
1) - <Variable (limited...> to <Variable (Powers of 2...>
2) - Ticking the <Restrict block size...> box
3) - Setting the <Source Block Count> to maximum
4) - Setting the <Number of Recovery blocks> to 127
You will receive a Gold Star if you can figure out why you will get more blocks
with more recovery, while at the same time posting a much smaller percentage.
Hint:
Q: - When is 10% not 10%?
A: - When it can't FIX 10%!
Have a wonderful day, I am
Isis
|
|