regarding the spam
I'm still re-parsing all the mass of content, and since I mentioned
about the spam, I just noticed the message below. I am trying it now,
but have not gotten it to work yet.
this:
[0-9a-f]{32}
gives me a syntax error
this:
{[0-9a-f]*}
did work, but marked EVERYTHING, good and bad, so this will take a bit
of testing to get the right pattern... if I can figure one, that is,
that only filters the gibberish.
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 10:40:38 -0700, Worker wrote:
> Reposting this from another group.
>
> .....
>
> For forte agent use this is filter field
>
> Subject:
> {[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-
f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]
[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]
[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]}
>
>
> It's a complicated filter so make sure to set to MARK READ first to test
> it first to make sure it works. It did for me.
>
> .....
>
> You should be able to condense
> {[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-
f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]
[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]
[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]}
>
> down to [0-9a-f]{32}
It worked. Thanks!
|
|