| Re: VPN education, thanks to RIB |
|
| RIB (rib@rack.com) |
2017/08/05 01:30 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: RIB <rib@rack.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.documentaries
Subject: Re: VPN education, thanks to RIB
X-Newsreader: NewsLeecher v7.0 Final (http://www.newsleecher.com)
References: <686aoc1v38gqm55htfgv1d8uhoirmbg7t0@4ax.com>
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <kuehB.220804$qd4.117527@fx13.fr7>
X-Complaints-To: http://www.newsleecher.com/support/
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2017 07:30:24 UTC
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2017 07:30:24 GMT
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2588706932
X-Received-Bytes: 2040
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.documentaries:8346
In reply to "m2" who wrote the following:
> That Wikipedia page was not very useful, but they also had a page
> specific to PureVPN that was much better with details. It is Chinese
> based. It comes out of Hong Kong! So at least for now, it is okay.
> It sounds very well respected as a good VPN service. I hope Hong Kong
> keeps its freedom for a few more years, and $70 for 2 years of service
> still sounds like a great deal to me. If China does get nasty, my
> loss would be trivial compared to the Honk Kong'ers.
>
That Wikipedia page was not very useful, but they also had a page
specific to PureVPN that was much better with details. It is Chinese
based. It comes out of Hong Kong! So at least for now, it is okay.
It sounds very well respected as a good VPN service. I hope Hong Kong
keeps its freedom for a few more years, and $70 for 2 years of service
still sounds like a great deal to me. If China does get nasty, my
loss would be trivial compared to the Honk Kong'ers.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purevpn
-----------------------------
I stated that PureVpn was Chinese. What I should have said is it is Chinese
based working out of Hongkong. That's their head office but their infrastucture
is world wide. They don't operate within China itself to my knowledge so are
not a target.
I don't think China will or can shut them down anytime soon.
RIB.
|
|
|