That Wikipedia page was not very useful, but they also had a page
specific to PureVPN that was much better with details. It is Chinese
based. It comes out of Hong Kong! So at least for now, it is okay.
It sounds very well respected as a good VPN service. I hope Hong Kong
keeps its freedom for a few more years, and $70 for 2 years of service
still sounds like a great deal to me. If China does get nasty, my
loss would be trivial compared to the Honk Kong'ers.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purevpn
On Fri, 04 Aug 2017 19:16:58 GMT, NoOne <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:
>On Fri, 04 Aug 2017 14:23:29 -0400, m2 wrote:
>
>> I really appreciate RIB's comments, and am reading the Wikipedia page on
>> VPN's for an overview. I'm a little curious about the mention that
>> PureVPN is Chinese based. I was listening to a podcast from NPR yesterday
>> that mentioned Apple computer taking away their VPN product from the
>> Chinese public, because it was forbidden by the government. Now I see
>> wikipedia saying something similar, "VPNs have been banned in the People's
>> Republic of China and Russia." I'm not worried about that, since I dont
>> live in China or Russia, but just curious what it all means.
>
>The ban meant that many VPN services in China closed up shop. Taking out
>a two year plan with a Chinese VPN provider might not be the best idea in
>the circumstances.
|
|