Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "|--Spike=-" <|--Spike=-@Home.Co.UK>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.documentaries
Subject: Re: Spike - Thanks much! - Agent-NewHeaders.jpg (0/1) - Agent.Ignore.Flaw.01.jpg (0/1)
Message-ID: <hdrgvblj2q9ibsshderdsjikbq215kuu4j@4ax.com>
References: <taelub566vaj32uft12q5ik737b9fe78n4@4ax.com> <3_KGz.26286$Fc3.6532@fx08.fr7> <ifloubpfksdi8lj5447lhqrm36ll7u37t7@4ax.com> <n50publudati3a3vm4eevg19olrts4tbne@4ax.com> <4oqvub58rb3i91dgshpodo647aokgbba28@4ax.com> <s8k0vbd56t6cj13t0g57gl5ld4p2901cnd@4ax.com> <q3v5vblasda1ssgsscoefrlv1ia5b002vg@4ax.com> <p2pgvb97clc7911pl9ghv83pu3bjopfn7i@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 84
X-Complaints-To: abuse@tweaknews.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 03:55:11 UTC
Organization: Tweaknews
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 04:55:11 +0100
X-Received-Body-CRC: 61692915
X-Original-Bytes: 5105
X-Received-Bytes: 5392
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.documentaries:7039
On Sat, 08 Oct 2016 04:14:04 +0100, "|--Spike=-"
<|--Spike=-@Home.Co.UK> wrote:
>>That last thing you said confuses me:
>>
>>>To add to your list of Agent flaws there is also the one that
>>>'ignores' random files that you have Not set to be ignored !
>>>I often download an episode of something and find a rar or two
>>>missing, then have to select view All messages to find the ignored
>>>missing parts.
>>
>>I have View->All Messages checked and have never set it to anything
>>else. I've never "ignored" anything, and am puzzled that it would
>>randomly ignore a rar file. Certainly sounds more like a flaw than a
>>feature. It sounds similar to the problem I mentioned when the
>>"threaded sort" button was turned on by the date sort method, and it
>>hid things from me. It hasn't happened in years, so I forget the
>>details, but I always unclick that button when I notice it is turned
>>on. It may be unrelated to your problem, except that in both cases,
>>files were not seen that should have been visible, and might be a flaw
>>in the threading code. When you find the part, is it marked to be
>>ignored, or do you just find it, and can't explain why it wasn't there
>>before? That was my experience. When I unclicked the thread button,
>>my file would appear, but it wouldn't make sense to me why it should
>>have been attached below some seemingly unrelated message. It was one
>>of the bugs I reported and was told it wouldn't be fixed. I think it
>>is because it isn't repeatable, but happens randomly, as you said.
>>
>>Agent is managing HUGE data sets, so we're just lucky it works as
>>great as it does.
>>
>>cheers!
>>
>>:)
>>
>>
>>
>========================================================
>View All Messages/View Unread Messages/Randomly Ignored Rar Parts.
>As You choose to Delete messages when you have read them, then there
>would be No difference to you between these two views.
>Whereas, I mark them read instead of deleting and let the Purging take
>care of them (after a month).
>Therefore, my normal view would be Viewing Unread Messages'. A month
>worth or 'Read' headers would still be there (in the background) in
>case I might have missed something.
>
>My default killfilter is set with the 'ignore' option ticked, another
>option is 'Mark as Read' but I have also found this to be flawed...
>some series I have killfiltered kept coming back unless the ignore
>option was selected.
>
>Missing (Ignored) files...
>I have often downloaded an episode of a series and found there to be
>missing blocks (on the Par check), after checking the par data it
>usually turns out that Agent has chosen to ignore a complete rar file
>section from the collection... thats why I'm short on blocks.
>It does this for No reason and is certainly another flaw.
>I can double-click on the ignored part and it will download, but I
>have no idea Why it was ignored in the first place.
>
>I have even found parts of my own posts being ignored before ! Why the
>Hell would I Ignore myself !
>
>The 'threaded' flaw and the 'randomly ignore' flaw are two separate
>flaws.
>My Agent has both but they have nothing to do with each other.
>
>Agent IS managing huge sets of data, but its a computer programme, if
>the software is programmed properly by the Agent people then it Can't
>make mistakes and to say that is 'wont be fixed' is just a complete
>cop-out.
>***************************************************
>* 'There are only 10 types of people in the world... those *
>* who understand Binary... and those who dont' *
>***************************************************
>|--Spike=-
=====================================================
Speak of the Devil, my next download after posting the above...
***************************************************
* 'There are only 10 types of people in the world... those *
* who understand Binary... and those who dont' *
***************************************************
|--Spike=-
|
|
 - Agent.Ignore.Flaw.01.jpg (0/1)')){kind=link}