On Mon, 23 May 2016 00:04:52 -0500, TheQuinquagenaryBiker
<YurWorseNitemare@yahoo.com> wrote:
>I had to research for myself this "myth" claimed by the hans "jewboy"
>anderson that Christ lead an insurrection of 12 divisions under 12
>commanders (a thinly veiled reference to the Apostles) against the
>Romans. Guess what? Christ NEVER lead any such action against the
>Romans, thus forcing Pontius Pilate to crucify Christ.
>
>FYI, Candy Cunt, jewboy DID lie!!
>
>According to the canonical Christian Gospels, Pilate presided at the
>trial of Jesus and, despite stating that he personally found him not
>guilty of a crime meriting death, sentenced him to be crucified. Pilate
>is thus a pivotal character in the New Testament accounts of Jesus.
>
>According to the New Testament, Jesus was brought to Pilate by the
>Sanhedrin, who had arrested Jesus and questioned him themselves. The
>Sanhedrin had, according to the Gospels, only been given answers by Jesus
>that they considered blasphemous pursuant to Mosaic law, which was
>unlikely to be deemed a capital offense by Pilate interpreting Roman law.
>The Gospel of Luke records that members of the Sanhedrin then took Jesus
>before Pilate where they accused him of sedition against Rome by opposing
>the payment of taxes to Caesar and calling himself a king. Fomenting tax
>resistance was a capital offense. Pilate was responsible for imperial tax
>collections in Judaea. Jesus had asked the tax collector Levi, at work in
>his tax booth in Capernaum, to quit his post. Jesus also appears to have
>influenced Zacchaeus, "a chief tax collector" in Jericho, which is in
>Pilate's tax jurisdiction, to resign. Pilate's main question to Jesus was
>whether he considered himself to be the King of the Jews in an attempt to
>assess him as a potential political threat. Mark in the NIV translation
>states: "Are you the king of the Jews?" asked Pilate. "It is as you say",
>Jesus replied. However, quite a number of other translations render
>Jesus' reply as variations of the phrase: "Thou sayest it." (King James
>Version, Mark 15:2); "So you say". (Mark 15:2). Whatever degree of
>confirmation modern interpreters would derive from this answer of Jesus,
>according to the New Testament, it was not enough for Pilate to view
>Jesus as a real political threat. The chief priests began hurling
>accusations toward Jesus, yet he remained silent. Pilate asked him why he
>did not respond to the many charges, and Jesus remained silent, so Pilate
>was "astonished".
>
>Pilate appears to have been reluctant to allow the crucifixion of Jesus,
>finding no fault with him. According to Matthew 27:19, even Pilate's wife
>spoke to him on Jesus' behalf. According to the gospels, it was the
>custom of the Roman governor to release one prisoner at Passover, and
>Pilate brought out Barabbas, identified by Matthew as a "notorious
>prisoner" and by Mark as a murderer, and told the crowd to choose between
>releasing Barabbas or Jesus as per the custom, in the hopes of getting
>them to request the release of Jesus. However, the crowd demanded the
>release of Barabbas and said of Jesus, "Crucify him!" In Matthew, Pilate
>responds, "Why? What evil has he done?" The crowd continued shouting,
>"Crucify him!"
>
>Pilate ordered a sign posted above Jesus on the cross stating "Jesus of
>Nazareth, The King of the Jews" to give public notice of the legal charge
>against him for his crucifixion. The chief priests protested that the
>public charge on the sign should read that Jesus claimed to be King of
>the Jews. Pilate refused to change the posted charge, saying "What I have
>written, I have written." ("Quod scripsi, scripsi"). This may have been
>to emphasize Rome's supremacy in crucifying a Jewish king; it is likely,
>though, that Pilate was offended by the Jewish leaders using him as a
>catspaw and thus compelling him to sentence Jesus to death contrary to
>his own will.
>
>The Gospel of Luke also reports that such questions were asked of Jesus;
>in Luke's case it being the priests that repeatedly accused him, though
>Luke states that Jesus remained silent to such inquisition, causing
>Pilate to hand Jesus over to the jurisdiction of Herod Antipas, namely
>Galilee which was not part of Roman Judea. Although initially excited
>with curiosity at meeting Jesus, of whom he had heard much, Herod
>(according to Luke) ended up mocking Jesus and so sent him back to
>Pilate. This intermediate episode with Herod is not reported by the other
>Gospels, which appear to present a continuous and singular trial in front
>of Pilate. Luke, however, made further reference to this involvement of
>Herod along with Pilate in Jesus' execution and linked it with the
>prophecy about the Messianic King found in Psalm 2, as we can read in
>Luke's other book, Acts 4:24-28. This could explain why he counted this
>episode important.
>
>Compared with the synoptic gospels, the Gospel of John gives more detail
>about that dialogue taking place between Jesus and Pilate. In John, Jesus
>seems to confirm the fact of his kingship, although immediately
>explaining, that his "kingdom" was "not of this world"; of far greater
>importance for the followers of Christ is his own definition of the goal
>of his ministry on earth at the time. According to Jesus, as we find it
>written in John 18:37, Jesus thus describes his mission: "[I] came into
>the world...to bear witness to the truth; and all who are on the side of
>truth listen to my voice", to which Pilate famously replied, "What is
>truth?" ("Quid est veritas?") (John 18:38)
>
>Whatever it be that some modern critics want to deduce from those
>differences, the end result was the same for Jesus and Pilate, as it was
>in all the other three Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke). In the same chapter
>of John 18 verse 38 (King James Version, compare with other versions) the
>conclusion Pilate made from this interrogation was: "I find in him no
>fault at all".
>
>Pilate agrees to condemn Jesus to crucifixion, after the Jewish leaders
>explained to him that Jesus presented a threat to Roman occupation
>through his claim to the throne of King David as King of Israel in the
>royal line of David. The crowd in Pilate's courtyard, according to Mark's
>gospel, were incited by the chief priests to shout against Jesus. The
>Gospel of Matthew adds that before condemning Jesus to death, Pilate
>washes his hands with water in front of the crowd, saying, "I am innocent
>of this man's blood; see you to it."
>
>Responsibility for Jesus' death:
>
>In all gospel accounts, Pilate is reluctant to condemn Jesus, but is
>eventually forced to give in when the crowd becomes unruly and the Jewish
>leaders remind him that Jesus' claim to be king is a challenge to Roman
>rule and to the Roman deification of Caesar. Roman magistrates had wide
>discretion in executing their tasks, and some question whether Pilate
>would have been so captive to the demands of the crowd. Pilate was later
>recalled to Rome for his harsh treatment of the Jews.
>
>With the Edict of Milan in AD 313, the state-sponsored persecution of
>Christians came to an end, and Christianity became officially tolerated
>as one of the religions of the Roman Empire. Afterwards, in 325, the
>First Ecumenical Council at Nicaea promulgated a creed which was amended
>at the subsequent First Council of Constantinople in 381. The Nicene
>Creed incorporated for the first time the clause was crucified under
>Pontius Pilate (which had already been long established in the Old Roman
>Symbol, an ancient form of the Apostles' Creed dating as far back as the
>2nd century AD) in a creed that was intended to be authoritative for all
>Christians in the Roman Empire.
>
>Pilate's reluctance to execute Jesus in the gospels has been seen by
>Anchor Bible Dictionary and critical scholars as reflecting the authors'
>agenda. It has thus been argued that gospel accounts place the blame on
>the Jews, not on Rome, in line with the authors' alleged goal of making
>peace with the Roman Empire and vilifying the Jews (the leadership, the
>priest, etc., as is justifiably so!).
>
>So, Candy Cunt, who is the false witness? Hans "jewboy" Anderson? or! The
>Entire Scholar Academia?!!
>
>BTW, the revolt (there were three) which jewboy accredited Jesus for? DID
>NOT OCCURR for another 100 years AFTER the Crucifixion of Christ!!
>
>Still, I wonder where jewboy has gone? Knowing he lied to all within the
>group, I should say after his big, fat, rat nose fell off, he is standing
>at the crossroads where, according to jewboy, he must be hiding on the
>same lonely road where Christ was executed. You know, standing within the
>plethora of all that jewish stink and revisionist history....
>
>Biker...Always in your face!!!
I'm sorry that Hans Jewish cannot be here today. I and my friends cut
off his head two weeks ago, so you will have to deal with me, Allah Be
Praised.
But you can not use your bible and it's fictional stories to justify
what your mythological Jesus did. You see, it is by definition
prejudiced to support it's own narrative. Of course, Jezuz'z followers
wanted to place the blame on Jews so they exhonorated the Romans and
put the blame on jews instead. A bad thing to lie like that, but was
the only way to make the jewish ones look really really bad. And
besides, if they put the blame on Romans, Romans would put them on
crosses along the highway, too. Smart thing to blame the other guy,
no?
No, you must use legitamate historical documents outside of your
bible. That is, secular historical documentation which is not tainted
by its own motives. Very few, if any, still exist, but that not my
fault.
And by the way, my young friend, I did see your comments here when you
first complained against our late visitor, Jewish. Are you still here?
Have not no thing more important in your life than to cavil and
complain here on your Usenet thing? Such a shame it is. Come to join
us and well will give you something really worthwhile to do: riding
your bike over the heads of all none mooselimbs!!
How do you say? Biker, you is putz!
Hans Muslim Anderson
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
|
|