On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 20:46:45 -0500, TheQuinquagenaryBiker
<not.a.fan.of.jewry@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Christ was executed by the romans at the behest of the jew priests,
>princesses, leaders, moneychangers, WHAT EVER YOU WANT TO FUCKING ARGUE THE
>PERSONAGE TO BE, you (the jews) killed Him, He died in the capitol of
>jewtown (Jerusalem) and as the romans were leading our Savior off to the
>killing field, the jews were counting out the 30 pieces of silver you paid
>as bounty to another jew for selling Him out!! Don't even dare argue the
>fine points, THE JEWS TURNED ON CHRIST, THE JEWS SOLD OUT CHRIST, JEWS
>KILLED CHRIST (regardless of the instrument used), WHO WAS ONE OF YOUR OWN,
>OUT OF FEAR, LUST FOR POWER AND GREED!!!
>
>...... and its this kinda of argumentative bullshit by the jews (feebly
>attempting to rewrite history) that is the basis for the extreme hatred by
>the rest of the religions!!
>
>BIKER!
Jesus referred to himself as "The Son of Man" in reference to the Old
Testament reference to the one who would vanquish the evil which was
devouring the world. Jesus' notion of the evil that was devouring the
world was the Roman empire; and he took it upon himself to be the "son
of man" who would do the job as far as the Holy Land was concerned.
So he assembled a militia of twelve divisions under twelve commanders
with the objective of driving Rome out of the Holy Lands. The uprising
failed, and the Romans crucified Jesus as a political troublemaker,
just as they'd crucified hundreds of other troublemakers before and
after Jesus.
And not on some remote hilltop where no one would see the execution,
but along one of the main roads through the town, where it would be
seen by everyone travelling into and out of the area, as a warning.
That was the objective of the Roman method of execution: make the
corpse public as a threat to future troublemakers. And, for what it's
worth, Roman law forbad, on penalty of crucifixion, the removal of any
crucified body until it rotted on the cross or was eaten by wildlife.
Forget this "rose three days later" nonsense. Pretty story, but never
happened. Jesus died, he stayed dead, and the newly formed religious
community decided to stick their finger into the eye of the Emperor by
claiming that while the Emperor claimed divine right by declaring
himself 'a' son of 'a' god, the followers of Jesus claimed their guy
was superior to the Emperor by claiming he was 'the' son of 'the' god.
I'm not telling you that you can't continue to believe what you
believe. I'm telling you that there is no connectin between the
historical Jesus and the theological Jesus, the latter of which is a
fabrication to bolster the sensitivies of the new religious community
by claiming victimhood by the dominant religious community they were
separating themselves from and the secular government of the day.
I won't comment any further. Just remember that you were the one that
started this argument with your smart-ass retort. I merely commented
on the plethora of sex related documentaries being posted of late.
Hans Jewish Anderson
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
|
|