PeggLeg <reply@here.net> wrote in
news:121120150956043563%reply@here.net:
> I vote for loony...at least until he/she comes up with a better
> explanation. (Wow! Looks who's talking about loony...meaning ME.)
>
> PeggLeg
>
> In article <121120150105366530%KatieCal@aol.com>, Katherine
> <KatieCal@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <02k74b9efoh37tumdqir46irknntk17dtt@4ax.com>, |--Spike=-
>> <|--Spike=-@Home.Co.UK> wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:45:38 -0800, PeggLeg <reply@here.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > >...O.K., I wont let it stop me.
>> > >
>> > >dodo007: You mean to tell me that he is posting DIFFERENT episodes
>> > >somewhere else? I myself don't really want them, but they do fit
>> > >into the "documentary" vein, as I once pointed out. A lot of
>> > >people would probably want them and he has said zip about posting
>> > >them elsewhere. So, I wonder, why there? And why the same two
>> > >here? (over and over and over...)
>> > >See, there goes that babble again...
>> > >
>> > >PeggLeg
>> > =====================================================
>> > That 'Smuggling Cocaine in RAR's' thing is Still Funny as Fuck
>> > though... We even get a serving tray aswell !
>> >
>> > ---
>> > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>> > software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>> >
>>
>> I think the cocaine-smuggling hypothesis (inside the Tommy Mac RARs)
>> is the only realistic explanation for the repeated (and repeated and
>> repeated and repeated) postings of these two files. I'm convinced.
>>
>> Well, either that or the poster is just plain stark raving loony.
>
I vote for steganography as well.
The way to verify this theory is to download multiple copies of the video
from different posting dates and compare the resulting binary files. You
could probably hide a lot of information in a video; you can hide quite a
bit in a .jpg. I'm not that motivated; Tommy Mac got into my killfile
quite some time ago along with his friends Rise Of FEMA, Amazing Guitar
Secrets, Never Get Busted, Kick Ass Moves and others.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
|