lookin4wendi <havenone@nowhere.com>, wrote
>On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:43:02 -0400, tm <123@msn.com> wrote:
>
>>Is there any way to case in the middle C-section so it stays white no
>>matter what color I sew it on. The first one is nice but I don't know
>>how to remove the white frame around the outside of the logo.
>>
ummmm, speaking as an artisan only, would leaving the colour
out of the machine in the sequence that the background sews in work?
Like just look for the stops and intervene then?
Anyone know for sure??
>The white frame was digitizing the background, & I would say the
>software thought the middle C section was part of the background.
>>
... sounds like it to moi.
>>Thanks for your nice work
>>
>>123
>
>
>I am only starting to do this.
>
>I used Click and Stitch.
>
>I would say that the whute area has to be closed off
>so click & stitch sees it as an area to digitize.
>
>My guess is that you would have to edit the graphic.
>
Exactly right.
I make some comment on this here:
MiD: <tVEjm.112950$rg4.101529@newsfe02.iad>
Two swift left clicks on that link will have Agent grab the post.
How it is retrieved in other software I have no idea.
>Herb is the one who usually does most of the digitizing but I haven't
>seen him here in a while.
Herb too uses click 'n' stitch and (as would many "auto" digitisers" he too
would say "best that can be done with the graphic supplied".
It is only "manual punchers" who could avoid the problem you point too.
Even then the problems with poor graphics need work before punching begins :-<
I guess at the end of the day IF a requestor does not want to supply suitable
graphics then the product uploaded as a design is the best they can hope for.
Someone has to edit the graphics, this is how it works.
Poor graphics equals poor design production.
OR
An old geek saying "Shite in = shite out".
Luckily there is graphic editing software that is easy to learn and freely
available so editing is no big deal.. just takes time is all.
|
|
 (0/1)')){kind=link}