On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:49:17 -0700,
in alt.binaries.crafts.pictures Herb <Herb@the.herb.garden> wrote:
>Pixie wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:31:34 +0200, "tropical@bla" <bla@hot> wrote:
>>
>>>first of all thnx pixie for translating before i could see the file indeed :)
>>>
>> ?!
>
>>>the one you send thats oke now :)
>>>
>>
>> It was "oke" when Herb sent it too.
>> You are having problems seeing Herb's attachments for some reason. I
>> just resent Herb's file to show you that it is a small problem at your
>> end of the computer.
>
>I think the problem may be that Netscape (OK, stop laughing!) uses
>only Mime-encoding and there are some news/mail readers out there that
>don't know what to do with it.
>
Something like that..
/nods
As said before (repetitiously boringly so), whilst it is convenient
for the "click n go" Browser operator to read and post (binary) to
Usenet the downside is their work is not seen by all, and usually
that group *includes* those who do know what they are doing :-/
There is also the problem that persons unknown use that method
to post malware. Examples of that fact are on your screen right now.
You do what suits you Herb, no skin off my nose.. just remember
that when folks say they cannot get your stuff it is not entirely their
problem, so work with them to resolve it.
Each to their own..
/shrug
>I didn't do it this time, but if I send the same thing out with Agent,
>people who couldn't get something the first time get it ok.
>
heh... has to scream a message at you :-/
cya 'round.
.. and thanks for filling the hole.
--
an Old Friend or Foe.. you choose
|
|