On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:41:15 +0930, hopper <long@drawn.net.invalid>
wrote:
>On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:06:42 -0600, in alt.binaries.crafts.pictures snicklefritz <Idunno@nothere.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:00:59 -0600, snicklefritz <Idunno@nothere.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>snipity snip
>
>>>welcome home sir
>
>"neither confirm nor deny" seems to work best
>around these 'ere purts.
>And gender is always a puzzle, for me at least :)
>
>If what you 'see' works for you then a soul has to
>be happy with that.
>In my experience it is those who listen who get
>the most from support.
>
>>>jr
>>*and technically, the suggestion to reload came from resident genius
>>Herb;)*
>>
>I am sure Herb is blushing brilliantly, and just
>the reaction a good troll seeks to raise.. heh.
I dont think Herb is the blushing type
>"technically" Herb works well from prompts.
>
>Moving on.. could a reasonable expectation
>find you posting something more substantial
>than trolls? Like you have been resident for
>quite some time if you know "tazoar" so it
>follows you must have quite a stash?
Ya know, that would have been a possiblity before all the threats and
inferred retaliation from "down under", now just a faded dream of
mine.
>You use a working version of Agent and
>Giganews so you have that much figured out.
>Need help with anything else?
no, but thanks for the civilized response...quite a breath of fresh
air from Oz;)
>
><switch to RX>
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
|