Tinkerbell <tinkerbell@pixiehollow.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:57:20 GMT, Isew <Isew@onthetreadle.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:50:54 +1030, Tinkerbell
>><tinkerbell@pixiehollow.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:13:40 GMT, Isew <Isew@onthetreadle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I am missing Ramone in my set. Can anyone share?
>>>
>>>
>>>Hoipe this is what you need,
>>
>>>
>>>Tinkerbell
>>Opened it and nothing there can you repost please.
>>tnkyou
^^trim^^
>
>I could repost but it would probably be the same.
>There is a pdf file with the colour chart and the design was in dst
>format. I have downloaded it and it seems fine. Could it be the file
>is too large, i could zip it if you thionk that would help
>
^^trim^^
Dahlinkz, news software can get confused were
more than one file is attached to a single article.
Such odd things may work for email attachments
yet create all sorts of problems for Usenet lists.
Success will happen when each file is attached to
its own article as is done when posting larger
sets of files. However such a thing is of no use
when posting into a thread. To satisfy the need to
keep the post in the thread the files can be zipped
up and posted as one file. I have made an example.
Or you could reply to the same post in two instances
attaching one file to each post. Messy but that works too.
I have made example.
Remember Dahlinkz, attaching files to discussion posts
is not good karma at all as the practice is easily abused
by those who would have you download 300KB to read
"B00! I see you!".
The small poor stitches are the ones that stand out in
the quilt.
One more little tip is to change the magnification of
your PDF printer to maybe 50%?
Doing so produces a much smaller file in PDF whilst
not damaging the document, saving a whole heap of
hard drive space and bandwidth. I have made example.
dE
<< ramone.zip >>
|
|