>On Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:02:55 +0000, walter hynebottom <walter@homebody.not.invalid> wrote:
>
>>
>>>On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 07:09:16 -0600, JerryH <JerryH@sewing.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:21:51 -0600, JerryH <JerryH@sewing.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Can anyone share this. If it happens to be in another newsgroup can you
>>>>>>let us know which group and name it is posted under. Thanks..
>>>>>
>>>>> 35 days ago.
>>>>>
>>>>> begin 644 madmax post voor twinkle4you.org..PE Design 6.nzb
>>>>> Attachment decoded: madmax post voor twinkle4you.org..PE Design 6.nzb
>>>>> `
>>>>> end
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for the quick response. But I am looking for version 7 or version
>>>>8. What you are referring to is version 6. Again Thanks..
>>>
>>>I friend of mine has v7, i can get a copy of the program from her, v8 we have
>>>not seen yet.
>>>But because what is going on over here i do not feel much for posting the
>>>program in this group.
>>>I do not like to do my enemy a pleassure with giving them something they
>>>sertainly download also.
>>>Beside that they always flame dutch posts and a mail to sewing.com will not help
>>>because the mail will bounce.
>>>You know, there are a few people here who are nice and you are one of them but
>>>there are also people who are plane rude and persist in holding me for someone
>>>else who had a huge fight with a down under person, they took it over and now i
>>>bear the grudge.
>>>I do not care because i am like the jew i strike back unproportional and i do
>>>not care to hurt people in the process and live and let live is out of the
>>>question now.
>>>Do me a proposal and you get version 7 but again i do not post it here.
>>
>>What do possibly hope to achieve with such a rambling post?
>>Usenet is not sympathetic to holding grudges, those persons
>>having terrible experiences in forums.
>>Do you think you are processing a grievance by your behavior?
>>
>>I am seeing only valid critique of your posting, what are you seeing?
>>Recently I asked you a question on the structure of a post you made.
>>Do you have a problem with anyone asking questions of you?
>>You refuse to offer any insight, so how are you to get feedback
>>on how you prepare a binary post? How are the budding new posters
>>to see you justify refusing cooperation?
>>
>>I will introduce a new concept for you, try it.
>>Usenet is all about giving freely of both time and resources. You give
>>freely when you can in supporting the forum for the enjoyment
>>of everyone. You do so in such a manner that is universally accepted.
>>
>>Making demands, making your own rules, offering a "proposal" in
>>exchange for work, is not universally accepted behavior.
>>To add to the disruption in gleefully acknowledging the tragic death
>>of anyone is a fast path to being cast out.
>>If in your history you have done all of these things willingly then do
>>not be surprised you attract the ire of active forum members.
>>
>>I sit down to see just what history you make, knowing where you are
>>now is a very troubled place
>>
>>
>Walter, I did not make this rules, the aussies made them and they keep telling i
>am Jean on one post out of the past were he made a remark on a posting while he
>was visiting me and using my internet connection.
>At that time his and mine ip address matched and sinds that moment they say he
>is me.
Dear ES,
For as many there are who watch and table computer marks on the
Internet there are many thousands more, socially skilled, able to
determine character traits. I see no children posting to this forum,
therefore I assume you are asking adults to understand your condition
in allowing you free reign to put whatever you desire in discussion or
posting binary.
I am questioning why it is you would expect such an acceptance.
Is it merely your condition which blocks your understanding of
concept?
>>I will introduce a new concept for you, try it.
>>Usenet is all about giving freely of both time and resources. You give
>>freely when you can in supporting the forum for the enjoyment
>>of everyone. You do so in such a manner that is universally accepted.
>>
Clearly there exists regular posters who believe you are a hazard
in group operations. Why that is I have no insight to other than
your refusal to answer my question. A question asked as it is very
plain to me you knew you what you were doing in posting an irritation.
Such acts are not the work of an honest person, nor indeed the route a
"balanced" persona would take.
Skipping off the original thread by changing the subject entry
has only served to add mortar to the wall you build.
How you gather your read of the list is your business, please refrain
from interfering with mine. I follow threads, be thankful a helpful
poster gave up your posted reply to my questioning of your behavior.
This single example is all that is required to see you are most
troubled indeed in understanding society within Usenet.
It is your statement the "aussies" made the rules which props up your
poor excuse to actively irritate. Be it known, as far as I am aware
the Australians were possibly non existent in bodies that contributed
to RFC submissions. Your construction of their support for a semblance
of some order, as being a motive for you to misbehave, is interesting.
Do you share this with Americans, Canadians and we of Celt stock?
My poor dear fellow, if so then it surely is a quagmire you are lodged
in. For it is as sure as the next moon, someone somewhere will
look at your rambling to arrive at the conclusion of "what a mess".
You are best advised to examine yourself in assessing behavior,
avoiding the temptation to be angry at your critics. Pandering to
those you believe to be "good" is a beg for attention that only the
scurrilous will take up. Be very careful of what you wish for. Often
around Usenet there is no shield for the hunter becoming the hunted.
There is a way forward for you.
--
hand feeding the lone anchovie
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
|