alt.binaries.crafts.picturesPrev. Next
Re: Someone wanted Jenny Haskins .. Attn: Willy
Absinthe Minded (nada@nada.com) 2012/02/29 10:35

Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.crafts.pictures:19944
Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!pull-news.sonic-news.com!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!cyclone03.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!voer-me.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe23.ams2.POSTED!39947f14!not-for-mail
From: Absinthe Minded <nada@nada.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.crafts.pictures
Subject: Re: Someone wanted Jenny Haskins .. Attn: Willy
Reply-To: none@net.invalid
Message-ID: <a8osk79jhgb6qro5ovvknc4mmuh0r3j2j8@4ax.com>
References: <f4WdnZ6Fy43yr9PSnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 33
X-Complaints-To: http://support.highwinds-media.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:35:17 UTC
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:35:14 -0500

On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:13:04 GMT, LoveCorrie@best.net wrote in:
<f4WdnZ6Fy43yr9PSnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@giganews.com>:

>
>On 29-Feb-2012, Willy Ewe <we@tinw.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Be aware the archive is charged with superfluous files, requiring
>> hours of sorting to obtain working folders.
>
>I hear you load and clear about posting files in future using an archive
>that is in smaller modules that can be combined in to a finished unit.  I
>will do some research on google to figure out how to do that.
>
>Regarding your comment << "Be aware the archive is charged with superfluous
>files, requiring hours of sorting to obtain working folders">>
>
> I found the Jenny Hasking collection on a bit torrent site, and did spend
> some time editing the file folder names and adding some pictures when found
> easily. I did not spend any time editing the collection from what I
> received other than to verify they were relevant as I was not personally
> interested in these designs myself.  I assumed that the end user could
> spend their own time editing the file contents to suit themselves.  I
> personally am not prepared to spend hours editing the folders for someone
> else's end use.  If I am incorrect in this assumption, and if  people
> receiving these files don't won't them unless I have combed through them,
> in future I will not post such collections.
>
>I would appreciate some guideance from other posters on what would be
>satisfactory to the group

I'm a newbie, so my ideas are only my opinion.  But perhaps each particular
collection could have been posted separately?  Then we could only download
the collections we would be interested in.

Follow-ups:1234
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite