danny@home.net wrote:
>Sorry about last post. I don't think I was Following the correct
>procedure for getting help on a design.
>
I carnt say there is a "correct procedure", Danny.. in
as much as if the file is posted so it gets to all servers
that is the end of that. The rest is maybe just "common
courtesy", accompanied by as much information in
regard to what is expected of the design. All that done,
there can be no guarantee the work will actually
produce anything.. as I see the whole of the matter :-)
> I work in a calibration lab in south Alabama, they are six of us and
>we was hoping to get this logo digitized so we can have them put on
>polo shirts. My wife has a Brothers PE- 770 Embroidery Machine, but we
>do not have software to digitized Designs.
>
The lack of software can be 'adjusted', if you so
wish, Danny ;->
I just the other day had cause to go look over in
<abdmc> to find there is selection of digitising
programs sitting there... for the picking.
Look for anything by "Postal Pete".
>I am attaching the logo in two .jpg sizes.
>
I see that, saw it in the first upload.. good
clean graphics, Danny... visually.
>I need it to be about a 3 inch X 4 inch to go on the left side of the
>shirt. There are no pockets on the shirts.
>
So that is 3 inches wide by 4 inches high?
>Thank you guys for your help.
>and again I'm sorry if I haven't followed the correct procedure.
>
>Danny
>
Just so I know you know, Danny?
Maybe you are reading particular comment,
comment I would urge you to disregard as
"good information" on any procedure.
There is one single individual hell bent on
making trouble in this NG. "Sucker-punch"
is his best effort, troll up a 'sucker', give
out a virtually impossible job then disappear
"poof" when the work IS produced, or a
question asked of the 'requestor'.
I am not going to pull any punches here, Danny.
You are driving Agent V5.
Two swift clicks on any of these Mids will
retrieve posts from a thread supported _only_
by him.
No other poster in ABCP has posted to that
thread, despite what you may find, and
read, different.
mid: <w1Ddp.120967$4c7.46154@newsfe06.iad>
mid: <Yqsegp.30f5n19Pg4.17362@newsfe22.iad>
mid: <AYofp.4801$0O1.846@newsfe01.iad>
mid: <wdpfp.1530$uN1.567@newsfe04.iad>
mid: <hEtip.18$iz3.9@newsfe04.iad>
mid: <AGtip.2$%a6.0@newsfe03.iad>
mid: <0QFlp.26273$tL6.18895@newsfe03.iad>
mid: <dximp.4702$tC3.1896@newsfe01.iad>
mid: <rpVvp.13869$rB2.3752@newsfe21.iad>
mid: <RdOop.2620$7N3.53@newsfe10.iad>
mid: <oNHrp.485$I64.413@newsfe04.iad>
mid: <JZeup.47595$0s5.4097@newsfe17.iad>
mid: <Yqsegp.30f5n19Pg4.17362@newsfe22.iad>
mid: <x2zup.14503$Ot6.12291@newsfe15.iad>
mid: <d8nxp.21453$Vp.3863@newsfe14.iad>
mid: <cr%yp.27334$Vp.4317@newsfe14.iad>
mid: <Yqsegp.30f5n19Pg4.17362@newsfe22.iad>
So now you know. The idiot is quite easy to spot.
To your request?
I have had a look at it earlier today.. not long after
your first post. The good news is I was interested
enough to just have a play with it. The bad news is
there is a lot of fine detail Danny, I doubt any of
that detail can be replicated easily, in stitches.
You may just have to trust what is done by the
digitiser, in selecting what makes up the "art"?
Certainly this job would not make it through
"auto-digitising".
Okay.. what does that mean for you?
Time.. time Danny, and review.
You are going to have to help with the project to
get what you want. Nobody can do
"whacko..!.. here you are".
That's the deal.. from my end.
OMMV
To illustrate what I point to?
So far we have had .. in recent months.
"my friend's kid has leukemia"
"my daughter is penniless after the GFC"
"i am bwian damiaged and neeed hilp[sic]"
ALL of those were a complete and utter
waste of time, for ABCP and for the
people sparing their time and skills to assist.
Let's not have to add.. "I am a 'Bama polo
playing boy with a wife".. to that list.
Most of us have wives or husbands, some
have both.. it is that kind of World, on Usenet.
cheers
--
kit
<< [logo]USTA001.hus >>
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
|