tin0pener <to@beans.org> wrote:
[...]
>You concede here the original 'effort' was
>not a valid post. Not "incomplete" but
>deliberately posted so as to cause the
>requestor [No Spam <Me@here.com>]
>a headache. I call that SPAM... you?
[...]
What you consider spam is irrelevant.
Spam is well defined and the definitions
newsadmins use is in the message referenced
below.
--
From: tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin)
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet,news.admin.net-abuse.misc,news.answers
Subject: FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:04:18 -0700
Message-ID: <spam-faq.20110320070418$6b71@news.killfile.org>
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
|
')){kind=link}