On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 07:09:25 +1000, prntGuy <pG@paper.no> wrote in:
<l2u4o6d5j0jqs7epa88n9c6buuv5nlanb7@4ax.com>:
>Erma <none@none.com> wrote:
>>I have posted my first and second attempt at 'webifying' the pdfs (that
>>came along with the lace files earlier requested) on the
>>alt.binaries.vj.tester. Would you be so kind as to look at them and let me
>>know how I did? If they are correct I will post here. If they need work,
>>then give me suggestions how to fix them please.
>>Thanks so much for your time.
>>Erma
>>
>.. no worries, Erma.
>
>Pages 3 through 8?
>These are screen readable.. just.
>If this info is important to the project,,
>then, given the excellent resizing to under 1MB,
>you do have some 'room' to improve the view.
>Try increasing the DPI to say 175 or higher
>and accept a greater file size.
Is it possible to take this pdf and have some of the pages at one dpi and
other pages at another? Did that make sense? What I was wondering
was...you say pages 3-8 could use the dpi increased a bit. I can see what
you mean. They are a bit hard to see(well, ok...a lot hard to see) Can I
take this document and have pages 1,2,9-13 at 150 and pages 3-8 at 175 or
even 200 all in the same document? If so, how would I go about this. This
is the first I've worked on reducing pdf size, and I couldn't see how on my
own.
>For a document that size 2MB would not be an
>unreasonable outcome for posting size.
Or is the 2MB size you refer to for the whole document done in say 175 or
slightly higher dpi?
>That said..?... the tute appears to be the purpose
>of the document with the sewing detail "added in".
>Using that premise I would say... job is done.
>The pictures and instructions are fine as they
>are now, either print.
>
>.. "goldstar" stuff... btw :-)
Thanks...I had a good teacher ;-) (I followed a post you had made a while
back with instructions)
|
|