On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:36:24 +1000, hopper
>Pixie <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com.invalid>:sayed
>>On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:40:43 +1000, hopper
>>
>
>/snipT
>
>>>Agreed.
>>>However this is <carntfigureitout> making the
>>>design :-p
>>>The danger of quashing the flicker before the wick
>>>starts sucking real fuel is way too great,, solly.
>>>
>>/shakes head...
>>/plays Newcastle Song...
>>
>huh..?
>?
>?
>Pixie..!!... tut tut... so now I am a
>Hells Angels member ??? :->
>
/pffffffffft...
Hum the chorus to yourself...
The bit about never letting chances go by...
You? A Hell's Angel Biker??
A big softie like you??
I'm seein' you on a Ulysses run to the gold coast wiff the other
pacifists...
rofl...
/tic
>/snip
>
>>>"need to know" comes first tho' :-)
>>>
>>Handy to know the program it was created in.
>>Looks familiar.
>>
>It will be something held for quite some
>time... bet on it:-)
>
The work looks familiar... /suspicion rears its ugly head
>/snip
>
>>>.. an' worse.
>>>Me I like jumps best, for "obvious"<bg>
>>>
>>Hmmmmmm... no comment!
>>You and your jumping obsession... /shudder!
>>
>I thought ladies loved snipping
>hanging things??
>No??
>
Only when we have no further need for the hanging bit.
It just gets in the way after a while...
ROFL
>>>>Stop lookin' at me like you ain't!
>>>>
>>>Me..??
>>>I am "owning up"...!!!
>>>
>>As opposed to owning it, period.../grin
>>
>/visions of pushing my dog's turds next door
>
>heh heh
>
Heh... you missed one...
/points...
/laff
>/snip
>
>>>Certainly. See attached graphic.
>>>Near as I can tell it aint tatami.
>>>
>>That's what I meant.
>>You can choose how you want the turning stitches to look.
>>Either "blunt" like tatami, or sharp. Each has its uses.
>>
>..an' one day I will work that part out.
>
The blunter tatami style ending works well on curves. Smoothing the
curve (in most cases).
The pointed ending works better on straight lines.
The straight line between two linear points thing doesn't require any
bending, so as long as the points are lined up (straight) the edge
will be neat (and not dotty crooked).
>I figure the zigzag style is handy for 'profiling' but
>the other two choices, "blunt" and "sharp" I am still playing with.
>
I need a pointy stick and a whiteboard for this lesson... /grin
>>But the widening in the middle has me beat. I have never seen that
>>before.
>>It's creating an "uneven" stitching surface.
>>
>Program interpretation.. the error could be anything from a poor read
>of the graphic to slow maths ability of the CPU.
> <shrug>
>
The second bit of your conclusion, I doan think so.
I am not one to blame the tools... all the time...
Tools, in this instance, means the application. /laff
Not the other tool....
>>>Something else.. something trying to be satin.. methinks
>>>
>>Nope. Satin is a single column of one stitch jumps. Zig zag bunched up
>>if you like. Mostly used as a border type stitch, or in applique.
>>Your favourite.../giggle...
>>
>I hathes applique :->>>
>
Mmmyes... we've had a few "discussions" about applique in our time.
None have ended well...
/grin
>>If there is any more than one stitch in the width, then it is not
>>satin.
>>Satin stitch is so called because of its slightly raised nature when
>>sewn. It gives a smooth satin like sheen.
>>The green box around the WR is satin. And should sew well.
>>
>It is the best bit of satin in the design.. in my clueless
>opinion .. heh heh
>
Hmm. I'm not sure why Herself canned it.
It was very fixable.
I have seen much worse being paraded as the second coming in group.
>>>/twiddle thumbs
>>>/mutters
>>> I hathes being lost..!
>>>
>>You is not lost. Terminology will become second nature.
>>I haven't opened it in Wilcom (cos I diddun want the view to warp),
>>but the different stitching areas stick out in my program.
>>It may stitch ok, depending on the weight of the thread. With 30wt,
>>I doubt it would be noticeable.
>>With 40wt, depending on the surface it was going on... it may show up.
>>
>mm.kkkkaaaaaaayy...
>/more thumb twiddling
>
/waves fog away from your head.
Now I've upset you!
You diddun know that various weights of thread are used??
(I've been keeping that for special from ya...rofl)
50wt for some heirloom, some lace and fine baby designs??
30wt is a favourite for redwork and sparse designs that need a bit of
oomph??
40wt is generally used by the masses for everything.
And then there is the textured range of thread for a fuzzy or "woolly"
look....
/grin
It's like knitting. There is the fine stuff, and there is the
heavyweight stuff and the textured stuff.
Depends on the look you want to achieve.
>>>I spent all of ten seconds looking at the design, first up.
>>>
>>One should seek knowledge in everything.
>>Even in unexpected places.
>>You never know what you could bypass if you walk around with your eyes
>>closed all the time...
>>
>heh.. you been reading my press..!
>
/snicker...
You forgit that I _never_ forgit...
If I read it, it stuck.
Be afraid...
mehehe.
>>>If not for you that would have been the end of it, for me.
>>>You challenger you..!
>>> /laff
>>>
>>/me pushes limits.... /giggle
>>It's what I do... /snicker
>>Eh!! I'm erudite!!! I have it in writing an' all!!
>>ROFL
>>
>Indeed and from an esteemed troller no less.
>Wear that badge with pride, m'Dear <g>
>
Yeah, it shocked Him more'n it did me I think!
>/snip
>
>>>errrr... ummm.. _all_ of the alpha looks screwed over in a
>>>variety of ways.
>>>
>>But it will sew and not be lost in the fabric as some of the teeny
>>tiny lettering offerings have when posted to group.
>>Only Snickle knows what She needs as a benchmark.
>>This would be test sewn. Should be, I mean.
>>When that is done, Snickle will see what needs to be done (if
>>anything) Herself.
>>
>Yes well.. today we read the results of that effort.
>Something tells me this one is another who cannot sew.
>Thinks they can, but really, unless Button A is fully automated
>then "in the bin" it goes.
>I am filing her response for the attention of any digitisers who may
>be tempted to swallow her BS in the future.
>"See guys,, this is what happens when you feed this trollop".
>... sorta thing :-/
>
I am surprised that one who has been here longer than me, can't see
what is wrong with a sewout.
But, the request sounded genuine. /shrug
It only needed a little tweaking. Certainly not a lot.
>>>The "A" in the attached is as delivered.
>>>
>>No underlay... a bit naff!
>>
>The original alpha all had that problem. I cannot know whether the
>border had a run that was meant to be underlay or some attempt at
>edging but it does seem the program has set underlay for some stuff,
>just not the alpha.
>
Wilcom is a bit naff like that... /giggle... /starts running...
>>>The "G" is as digitised by a text engine in Willy.
>>>
>>Better...
>>
>I could 'wiggle it'.. if needed<g>
>
It seems a little "thin".
>>>The "E" is as "fixed up" in Willy, as an edit.
>>>
>>And better again.
>>But not entirely fair as a benchmark cos there are no curves.
>>Curves in satin are always a challenge.
>>And in curves, I include diagonals.
>>
>I hears ya :-)
>
Trying to do clean satin curves with only a trash graphic... always
tears if not endowed with perseverence.
>>Thing is, and it could just be the font, I doan mind the presentation
>>of the blue letters on Snickle's. Overall.
>>The white one's stick out more cos they are bigger.
>>
>I don't see it as any better or worse than what many here
>have accepted as "gee thanks that's great". Fritz could
>well stand the sewout IF herself wasn't on-selling the product.
>There is the problem for herself.
>
Yeah, I get that.
I am just really interested in what Herself has fallen over Herself to
sew and gush thanks in years gone by... when I wouldun have sewn it
with someone else's thread ... /grin
And yet She tosses Her own efforts.
>Finding a source for digitising that can be loaded to a machine and
>the "sew that" button engaged. The product good enough to impress a
>client of a buyer.
>
The Holy Grail of digitising.
If only the Ladies realised that "click and sew" is just bullshit on
the side of the box.
Digitising takes time... a lot of time, and a huge understanding of
everything involved from the machine to the fabric.
>Twould suck to be <snicklefritz>.
>
Herself is prolly a great nurse. Hope so.....
>Lazy, ignorant, and patronising (in "hawking her fork"),
>they don't come much better as quality Losers :-/
>
Misguided... as in Her judgement of GB... prolly.
But he sucked a lot in. She was just one in a long line.
It's just what he does. It's his hobby.
>.. thanks for your post.
>
Nah worries.
If that is Her digitising effort, I don't think She should give up so
quickly.
It had a few quirks that needed ironing out, but the compensation was
excellent and the satin was well under control.
Those mortgage people must mean a lot to Her for Her to be so worried
about it.
Pixie :-))
|
|
 - this one.hus (0/1)')){kind=link}