Pixie <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com.invalid>:sayed
>On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:40:43 +1000, hopper
>
/snipT
>>Agreed.
>>However this is <carntfigureitout> making the
>>design :-p
>>The danger of quashing the flicker before the wick
>>starts sucking real fuel is way too great,, solly.
>>
>/shakes head...
>/plays Newcastle Song...
>
huh..?
?
?
Pixie..!!... tut tut... so now I am a
Hells Angels member ??? :->
/snip
>>"need to know" comes first tho' :-)
>>
>Handy to know the program it was created in.
>Looks familiar.
>
It will be something held for quite some
time... bet on it:-)
/snip
>>.. an' worse.
>>Me I like jumps best, for "obvious"<bg>
>>
>Hmmmmmm... no comment!
>You and your jumping obsession... /shudder!
>
I thought ladies loved snipping
hanging things??
No??
>>>Stop lookin' at me like you ain't!
>>>
>>Me..??
>>I am "owning up"...!!!
>>
>As opposed to owning it, period.../grin
>
/visions of pushing my dog's turds next door
heh heh
/snipT
>>..now,,, how come I aint GWJ^^????
>>
>Thanks for the translation... I was lost... /laff
>
yer welcome :-)
/snip
>>Certainly. See attached graphic.
>>Near as I can tell it aint tatami.
>>
>That's what I meant.
>You can choose how you want the turning stitches to look.
>Either "blunt" like tatami, or sharp. Each has its uses.
>
..an' one day I will work that part out.
I figure the zigzag style is handy for 'profiling' but
the other two choices, "blunt" and "sharp" I am still playing with.
>But the widening in the middle has me beat. I have never seen that
>before.
>It's creating an "uneven" stitching surface.
>
Program interpretation.. the error could be anything from a poor read
of the graphic to slow maths ability of the CPU.
<shrug>
>>Something else.. something trying to be satin.. methinks
>>
>Nope. Satin is a single column of one stitch jumps. Zig zag bunched up
>if you like. Mostly used as a border type stitch, or in applique.
>Your favourite.../giggle...
>
I hathes applique :->>>
>If there is any more than one stitch in the width, then it is not
>satin.
>Satin stitch is so called because of its slightly raised nature when
>sewn. It gives a smooth satin like sheen.
>The green box around the WR is satin. And should sew well.
>
It is the best bit of satin in the design.. in my clueless
opinion .. heh heh
>>/twiddle thumbs
>>/mutters
>> I hathes being lost..!
>>
>You is not lost. Terminology will become second nature.
>I haven't opened it in Wilcom (cos I diddun want the view to warp),
>but the different stitching areas stick out in my program.
>It may stitch ok, depending on the weight of the thread. With 30wt,
>I doubt it would be noticeable.
>With 40wt, depending on the surface it was going on... it may show up.
>
mm.kkkkaaaaaaayy...
/more thumb twiddling
>>I spent all of ten seconds looking at the design, first up.
>>
>One should seek knowledge in everything.
>Even in unexpected places.
>You never know what you could bypass if you walk around with your eyes
>closed all the time...
>
heh.. you been reading my press..!
>>If not for you that would have been the end of it, for me.
>>You challenger you..!
>> /laff
>>
>/me pushes limits.... /giggle
>It's what I do... /snicker
>Eh!! I'm erudite!!! I have it in writing an' all!!
>ROFL
>
Indeed and from an esteemed troller no less.
Wear that badge with pride, m'Dear <g>
/snip
>>errrr... ummm.. _all_ of the alpha looks screwed over in a
>>variety of ways.
>>
>But it will sew and not be lost in the fabric as some of the teeny
>tiny lettering offerings have when posted to group.
>Only Snickle knows what She needs as a benchmark.
>This would be test sewn. Should be, I mean.
>When that is done, Snickle will see what needs to be done (if
>anything) Herself.
>
Yes well.. today we read the results of that effort.
Something tells me this one is another who cannot sew.
Thinks they can, but really, unless Button A is fully automated
then "in the bin" it goes.
I am filing her response for the attention of any digitisers who may
be tempted to swallow her BS in the future.
"See guys,, this is what happens when you feed this trollop".
... sorta thing :-/
>>I have included some sampling (attached) and can only point the OP
>>at considering _always_ selecting the alpha and stitching those as a
>>"stand alone sequence".
>>IF the OP has relied on the software determining any alpha then there
>>is the problem with this design.
>>By "determining" I mean "click n stitch".
>>
>>The "A" in the attached is as delivered.
>>
>No underlay... a bit naff!
>
The original alpha all had that problem. I cannot know whether the
border had a run that was meant to be underlay or some attempt at
edging but it does seem the program has set underlay for some stuff,
just not the alpha.
>>The "G" is as digitised by a text engine in Willy.
>>
>Better...
>
I could 'wiggle it'.. if needed<g>
>>The "E" is as "fixed up" in Willy, as an edit.
>>
>And better again.
>But not entirely fair as a benchmark cos there are no curves.
>Curves in satin are always a challenge.
>And in curves, I include diagonals.
>
I hears ya :-)
>Thing is, and it could just be the font, I doan mind the presentation
>of the blue letters on Snickle's. Overall.
>The white one's stick out more cos they are bigger.
>
I don't see it as any better or worse than what many here
have accepted as "gee thanks that's great". Fritz could
well stand the sewout IF herself wasn't on-selling the product.
There is the problem for herself.
Finding a source for digitising that can be loaded to a machine and
the "sew that" button engaged. The product good enough to impress a
client of a buyer.
Twould suck to be <snicklefritz>.
Lazy, ignorant, and patronising (in "hawking her fork"),
they don't come much better as quality Losers :-/
.. thanks for your post.
cheerio
--
hopper
|
|
 - this one.hus (0/1)')){kind=link}