On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:20:52 -0600, snicklefritz <me@nothere.com>
wrote:
>snicklefritz <me@nothere.com>:sayed
>>On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:04:31 -0600, snicklefritz <me@nothere.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>Could someone help me with this? Critique' please. Thank you
>>
>Ok, never mind....hehehehe. A digitizer I am not!
>
No.. and now never will be.
Read on to be told why.. or do as you usually
do and stick your fingers in your ears.. and froth :-/
In 2004 you wrote "I am a qualified Nursing Sister".
In 2004 you wrote "I work with children who have neural
motor problems. I am therefore qualified to say Taz has
severe mental retardation".
Both of those statements are paraphrased.. it is not beyond doing to
find and post the actual messages. There is no need.. YOU KNOW
you made those claims.
All made whilst "chatting" with someone you thought would save you
from the published embarrassments you read in my 'education' of you
when I was posting as <Tazoar>.
All made so as to _use someone_.
No different to what you do today in "sucking up" to Herb.
Too bad for you Gymmy Bob/Bengi revealed himself in your tiny brain
to be just the "snake in the grass" arsehole I was telling you he was.
In short.. you make poor Life choices and seek to fill out the gaps by
"bludging" off others.
A persona (UPA) commonly known around Usenet as "Loser".
Moving forward to today I expand on my "never will be" statement,
in telling you why you got responses from myself on your digitising
project.
In 2004 I published the biography you did read. It is public record.
What was not in that document was "how I got there".
I provide that information now, as support for my statement "never
will be" .
Entering the workforce after a solid education interrupted by "on farm
needs", I gained a trade qualification, to then begin a business in a
service industry. I started with little money, a vehicle discarded by
my FIL, and restored by myself. All of that and the skills of Life I
had accrued up to that time.
Poorly equipped was I, but determined.
I was not to repeat the mistakes of my heritage in ending Life as a
"bog farmer".
I studied intensively in the time I had left in a day after work and
completed a tertiary qualification in my chosen field.
A lot of that required attendance at University and great hardship for
my fledging family. In time the business flourished. By 38 I had my
first million in the pocket, and 16 good and willing employees
to go with it, as a Life investment.
The late 80's saw most of that demolished in the overseas loans
debacle and 22% interest rates. I started again, with the remnants of
the rendered down business. By age 50 I was able to sell the business
to an employee 'syndicate', and, together with wise investments, well
heeled to enjoy a full Life well into my "sundown years".
I chose instead to join a community focused bureaucracy in primarily
helping those with even less advantage than I had when I started out
in the workforce. Bureaucracies being what they are in this Country
the 'jaunt' was shortlived. So, at 53, I retired to "life on the
farm", a dream of a "Greenacres" lifestyle being rewards for a Life
well spent "earning".
[Minus the dotty spouse (Eva Gabor), my partner is one clued-up lady,
and as determined as I in her own Life.]
Avoiding the GFC (from lessons learnt in the late 80's), today I enjoy
a fully enriched lifestyle with little else to do but amuse myself
with various entities around Usenet.
You, Fritz, are one of those few.
You saw what reaction _everyone_ had to Gymmy Bob again
claiming your identity.
MiD: <jEBvo.13202$hf.7092@newsfe24.iad>
Ya' just did some work for ole' Gymmie Bob and
attempted the "herb and I are buddies" act again.
Herb believed it.. and many others who may have helped you joined with
that. I didn't, I knew better... buuuut I elected to allow you to see
the stupidly of your ways for yourself.
You did.
That thought of yours surprised me.
MiD: <jppuc6hpv5bkell8ic63p38u1qi6b6fj7d@4ax.com>
Could someone help me with this?
Critique' please. Thank you
Now.. label me with whatever evil you can muster, but when I see
someone **trying**, no matter _whom_ they are I will always allow some
generosity in acknowledging the effort.
There is why I spent 10seconds looking at your digitisng and wrote the
comment I did:
MiD: <bYJzo.312010$Ua4.4230@en-nntp-09.dc1.easynews.com>
Have you ran the file in a "sewing simulator"??
I ask as there is one glaringly obvious error.
You can see Usenet working in the resulting conversation.
Pixie possibly had no more motivation to post a follow-up than to
correct myself.
Many like to "try it on", in a number of forums I post to.
I wont be trolled.. I am the Troll, few better skilled than I.
The difference in ABCP is one where I am indeed "out of my depth"
when addressing sewing issues. I have never pretended to know more
than I do, and, as said many many times, I am well entrenched in
"newbie school" when it comes to digitising.. but I do try. That, and
I hold respect for those that do know better and do spend their time
in bending my vision down the correct road.
There is where YOU fail, and where the "why" is for folks like Pixie
to have influence over me.
Losers as you never will, have influence over me.
Losers as you never will entertain respect for your betters.
Losers as you will always be that, belittled Losers...no matter how
often you flash your virtual twat at those you believe you can
influence by presenting as a Usenet slut.
I well recognise the stereotype, and have seen the proof of those that
behave in such a way to actually project their RL person/character
into their posts.
I knew a Carolinian lady once, a long time ago. Her version of the
population of those States of the USA was.... "the men are busy in
truck pull contests whilst the woman are busy fucking the FedEx guy
for some tension relief.. and giving the GF "over the phone" suck by
suck accounts of the spree so as be "one up" on that homey sluts
efforts at fucking the milkman!!".
You are what you are.. you are what you make yourself.
Nobody else is to blame for your predicament.
Your little cottage industry is to fall on its arse simply because you
will not work at it. That digitising project was a huge signal for
you.
You blew it.
And slipped back to blowing Herb.
Relying on this NG to support YOUR business is not going to work out.
Take that to the Bank.. heh.!!... betcha that guy/gal wont be
impressed with a twat flash..!!
/PML
>Just stitched it
>out.....
>
Liar.
>redundant comes to mind.
>
Indeed this is so. You are.. to *anything*.
>Well back to the drawing board.
>
To build another 'cunning plan' in using others to do your work for
you?
READ the reason why that is not going to work out for you.
... you go smash a plate or something.
It is all you are good for.
Smashing stuff.
--
hopper
|
|
 - this one.hus (0/1)')){kind=link}