Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!s02-b57.iad!num01.iad!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!aqua.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!indigo.octanews.net!auth.beige.octanews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Pixie <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.crafts.pictures
Subject: Re: Req: digitizing please - Hlocation.jpg (1/1) - this one.hus (0/1)
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 20:54:46 +1000
Message-ID: <ecovc6t25p4kv11hl3nj6qqstc1hcqqs0n@4ax.com>
References: <qdOzo.365833$iV7.202040@en-nntp-15.dc1.easynews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 208
Organization: Octanews
NNTP-Posting-Date: 02 Nov 2010 04:54:23 CDT
X-Complaints-To: abuse@octanews.net
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.crafts.pictures:16750
X-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:54:23 UTC (s02-b57.iad)
On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:40:43 +1000, hopper
>Pixie <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com.invalid>:sayed
>>On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 12:49:17 +1000, hopper
>>
>>>snicklefritz <me@nothere.com>:sayed
>>>>On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:04:31 -0600, snicklefritz <me@nothere.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Could someone help me with this? Critique' please. Thank you
>>>>
>>>Have you ran the file in a "sewing simulator"??
>>>
>>It doan look like it... :-)
>>Doan even need a simulator.
>>
>Agreed.
>However this is <carntfigureitout> making the
>design :-p
>The danger of quashing the flicker before the wick
>starts sucking real fuel is way too great,, solly.
>
/shakes head...
/plays Newcastle Song...
>>This is where "which came first, the chicken or the egg?" could come
>>in handy!
>>A simple pressing of "delete" will fix that bit.
>>
>/nods
>"need to know" comes first tho' :-)
>
Handy to know the program it was created in.
Looks familiar.
>>>I ask as there is one glaringly obvious error.
>>>
>>Eh!! You've done that too!! /giggle...
>>You have!
>>
>.. an' worse.
>Me I like jumps best, for "obvious"<bg>
>
Hmmmmmm... no comment!
You and your jumping obsession... /shudder!
>>Stop lookin' at me like you ain't!
>>
>Me..??
>I am "owning up"...!!!
>
As opposed to owning it, period.../grin
>You got the wrong guy.
>
Nup... my eyesight ain't that bad yet!
Marco
Polo...
/points north
>You must be possessed with visions of
>your lamer buddy.. the 'avant-garde' /snarf\
>Gymmy Bob/Bengi/Josepi...!
>
Possessed with visions of himself??
YOU'VE got the wrong girl if you think that!
/laff
>..now,,, how come I aint GWJ^^????
>
Thanks for the translation... I was lost... /laff
I toyed with "good with Josepi"... an' thought that just sounds wrong
on too many levels... mehehe
>IS it because the sniveling li'l rat is off in the corner
>of (this) room masturbating a carrot?
>
Oh!! TMI!
Issun there a law against torturing carrots??
>Thinking it has "member power" in IT's hands..!!!!
>/fomclmao
>
Here... have a steak!
No salad bar for you... rofl...
>/snipt
>
>>(For Hopper, tatami stitching decides row spacing at the turning
>>stitch. The width you set it is created at the turning, so the width
>>from the last row stays even. This is not happening in the blue part,
>>so I can't figure how it is going in and out of the tatami style of
>>stitching).
>>Pictorially, the rows look like this (each row being two rows of
>>stitching - 8 rows) --
>>--------==========----------
>>--------==========----------
>>--------==========----------
>>--------==========----------
>>Does that make sense??
>>
>Certainly. See attached graphic.
>Near as I can tell it aint tatami.
>
That's what I meant.
You can choose how you want the turning stitches to look.
Either "blunt" like tatami, or sharp. Each has its uses.
But the widening in the middle has me beat. I have never seen that
before.
It's creating an "uneven" stitching surface.
>Something else.. something trying to be satin.. methinks
>
Nope. Satin is a single column of one stitch jumps. Zig zag bunched up
if you like. Mostly used as a border type stitch, or in applique.
Your favourite.../giggle...
If there is any more than one stitch in the width, then it is not
satin.
Satin stitch is so called because of its slightly raised nature when
sewn. It gives a smooth satin like sheen.
The green box around the WR is satin. And should sew well.
>/twiddle thumbs
>/mutters
> I hathes being lost..!
>
You is not lost. Terminology will become second nature.
I haven't opened it in Wilcom (cos I diddun want the view to warp),
but the different stitching areas stick out in my program.
It may stitch ok, depending on the weight of the thread. With 30wt,
I doubt it would be noticeable.
With 40wt, depending on the surface it was going on... it may show up.
>>And the second WR (that's the hint Hopper diddun give you!)
>>
>I do have my limits.
>
Do you what!!! /laff
/notes understatement of the century...!!!
>I spent all of ten seconds looking at the design, first up.
>
One should seek knowledge in everything.
Even in unexpected places.
You never know what you could bypass if you walk around with your eyes
closed all the time...
>If not for you that would have been the end of it, for me.
>You challenger you..!
> /laff
>
/me pushes limits.... /giggle
It's what I do... /snicker
Eh!! I'm erudite!!! I have it in writing an' all!!
ROFL
>>This may not sew as a "gap", but it may form an uneven ridge.
>>
>errrr... ummm.. _all_ of the alpha looks screwed over in a
>variety of ways.
>
But it will sew and not be lost in the fabric as some of the teeny
tiny lettering offerings have when posted to group.
Only Snickle knows what She needs as a benchmark.
This would be test sewn. Should be, I mean.
When that is done, Snickle will see what needs to be done (if
anything) Herself.
>I have included some sampling (attached) and can only point the OP
>at considering _always_ selecting the alpha and stitching those as a
>"stand alone sequence".
>IF the OP has relied on the software determining any alpha then there
>is the problem with this design.
>By "determining" I mean "click n stitch".
>
>The "A" in the attached is as delivered.
>
No underlay... a bit naff!
>The "G" is as digitised by a text engine in Willy.
>
Better...
>The "E" is as "fixed up" in Willy, as an edit.
>
And better again.
But not entirely fair as a benchmark cos there are no curves.
Curves in satin are always a challenge.
And in curves, I include diagonals.
Thing is, and it could just be the font, I doan mind the presentation
of the blue letters on Snickle's. Overall.
The white one's stick out more cos they are bigger.
>>Stability of fabric and use of good underlay will tell you what we can
>>only see on the computer.
>>
>.. and that is where I bow out .
>
>Good luck with your sewing, Pixie:-?
>
I doan need "luck"... I knows what I want... in embroidery...
Everything else just has to take care of itself cos I haven't a clue!
/laff
Pixie :-))
|
|
 - this one.hus (0/1)')){kind=link}