Pixie <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com.invalid>:sayed
>On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 12:49:17 +1000, hopper
>
>>snicklefritz <me@nothere.com>:sayed
>>>On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:04:31 -0600, snicklefritz <me@nothere.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>Could someone help me with this? Critique' please. Thank you
>>>
>>Have you ran the file in a "sewing simulator"??
>>
>It doan look like it... :-)
>Doan even need a simulator.
>
Agreed.
However this is <carntfigureitout> making the
design :-p
The danger of quashing the flicker before the wick
starts sucking real fuel is way too great,, solly.
>This is where "which came first, the chicken or the egg?" could come
>in handy!
>A simple pressing of "delete" will fix that bit.
>
/nods
"need to know" comes first tho' :-)
>>I ask as there is one glaringly obvious error.
>>
>Eh!! You've done that too!! /giggle...
>You have!
>
.. an' worse.
Me I like jumps best, for "obvious"<bg>
>Stop lookin' at me like you ain't!
>
Me..??
I am "owning up"...!!!
You got the wrong guy.
You must be possessed with visions of
your lamer buddy.. the 'avant-garde' /snarf\
Gymmy Bob/Bengi/Josepi...!
..now,,, how come I aint GWJ^^????
IS it because the sniveling li'l rat is off in the corner
of (this) room masturbating a carrot?
Thinking it has "member power" in IT's hands..!!!!
/fomclmao
/snipt
>(For Hopper, tatami stitching decides row spacing at the turning
>stitch. The width you set it is created at the turning, so the width
>from the last row stays even. This is not happening in the blue part,
>so I can't figure how it is going in and out of the tatami style of
>stitching).
>Pictorially, the rows look like this (each row being two rows of
>stitching - 8 rows) --
>--------==========----------
>--------==========----------
>--------==========----------
>--------==========----------
>Does that make sense??
>
Certainly. See attached graphic.
Near as I can tell it aint tatami.
Something else.. something trying to be satin.. methinks
/twiddle thumbs
/mutters
I hathes being lost..!
>And the second WR (that's the hint Hopper diddun give you!)
>
I do have my limits.
I spent all of ten seconds looking at the design, first up.
If not for you that would have been the end of it, for me.
You challenger you..!
/laff
>This may not sew as a "gap", but it may form an uneven ridge.
>
errrr... ummm.. _all_ of the alpha looks screwed over in a
variety of ways.
I have included some sampling (attached) and can only point the OP
at considering _always_ selecting the alpha and stitching those as a
"stand alone sequence".
IF the OP has relied on the software determining any alpha then there
is the problem with this design.
By "determining" I mean "click n stitch".
The "A" in the attached is as delivered.
The "G" is as digitised by a text engine in Willy.
The "E" is as "fixed up" in Willy, as an edit.
>Stability of fabric and use of good underlay will tell you what we can
>only see on the computer.
>
.. and that is where I bow out .
Good luck with your sewing, Pixie:-?
--
hopper
^^ GWJ
translates
Green With Jealousy
<< SchiclkeFritz.rar >>
|
|
 - this one.hus (0/1)')){kind=link}