I only replied in the same manner as I do on several of the embroidery
forums that I belong to. If, as you say, this person is not in any
real need of the information, perhaps it has helped someone else to
know how I go about it for myself. Thank you for the compliment.
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 07:18:39 +1000, hopper
>fushtas <fushtas <veronika@cuteemb.org>>:sayed
>>On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:05:48 -0400, R Bogers <robertbogers@msn.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>I have a great notions CD and Dakota Collectables 2008 but they are
>>>all DST and the color charts are way off. Is there an easy way to
>>>convert them. I need a little help pls....I use a bernina machine
>>
>>If you are needing to change the format to what your machine uses here
>>is a free software program that will convert designs.
>>
>>http://www.wingsxp.com/index.php/my_editor/
>>
>>That being said once the design is converted into your machines format
>>the colors will still be whack so what I do is I go to
>>
>>http://www.embroiderydesigns.com/
>>
>>Then I look up the design I want to use and the color chart is listed
>>on the page where the design is found e.g.
>>
>>go to embroidery designs com
>>type in the search field
>>dakota ch0074 OR great notions 9674
>>a thumbnail pic will come up
>>mouse over it and a box pops up that says click for details
>>click on details then you will see all the details for the design and
>>the color chart. Click on color chart.
>>Now the software I use I can change the colors on the design...
>>if that free "my editor" program doesn't let you make color changes
>>then you can just write it out on paper. Hope this helps.
>>
>Excellent posting, .m'Lady.
>Your advice is how the NG should be working for
>information threads. Sewers advising sewers, as it is
>done in the sewing group/s.
>It is because the male gender is 'dominant' in ABCP
>that much of the 'troubles' are posted.
>This thread being no different.. until you posted.
>
>Part of what I do here in ABCP is in empowering
>leaders as yourself. Others object to that, never
>mind.. ignore them:-)
>Sooo. FYI..?
>The original poster (OP) is a shonk (shyster-carpetbagger)
>being most likely what we in Australia call a proponent of
>a "Dorothy Dixer". In Usenet some people (loose use) believe it is
>great entertainment to invent a name, post a valid question
>in a dumb manner and sit back and watch the fools stumble over
>themselves in bringing up the information.
>There is little one can do to avoid falling victim to such trolls,
>particularly when the ego is rising, fast.
>Patience and a little looking is maybe the best advice I can
>give.
>A search on the Authors name is a good place to start:
>http://preview.tinyurl.com/28rjztu
>http://groups.google.com/groups/search?as_q=&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&num=100&scoring=&lr=&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=2010&as_maxd=1&as_maxm=1&as_maxy=2010&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=robertbogers%40msn.com&safe=off
> Your search - author:robertbogers@msn.com - did
> not match any documents.
>Next?
>Asking for more information is a good test of
>the genuine need. Rarely will these people use the same
>name or method twice in one thread. No response says
>you needn't bother wasting any more time on the task.
>More sillyness , as a response..?... that you can work with.
>
>Mostly the best skills you have are between your ears.
>
>fushtas...
>Contrary to your display on entering ABCP.. you have
>shown you have a fine attitude and the brains to make
>stuff happen.
>Congrats on what is a fine post.
>
>cheers
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
|