surprise <surprise_nospam@new.com>wrote:
>Wendy all you do with a null file is to change the name to the right
>one.
Why should anyone have to do this?
I -- for one -- would like to see you explain That.
You are aware that the atrophy of a file extension in a
posted archive causes servers to drop the post?
If not immediately -- as is happening all over with
sewhater's posts - but at least in the first 24 hours
as bots scan posted binary on their servers, you know
this??
> See if that works for you.
>
Of course it will, how else are the reposts made
possible.
You appear willing to help, and one should
appreciate that choice, putting aside your attitude in
understanding you are not as Usenet savvy as you
would have us all believe.
Truly helping would be to put an end to "null" files.
You think?
cheers
--
hopper
|
|