snicklefritz <me@nothere.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:48:37 -0600, snicklefritz <me@nothere.com>
>wrote:
>
>Hope this comes thru....this is just one of the stitchouts, on a
>duffle bag, I've made hats and scarves and shirts too......the
>young man riding for the cause is nearly at the goal of $5,000,
>thanks to you for your help!!!!
>jr
feh .!!.. dog's breakfast" best describes that
production.. Trollee.
/snarf
.. and the other items look like...???
As said previously one cannot make the mistake of
crediting you with any depth of thinking.. to do so
has you sailing off misinformed, the subsequent
'production' displaying you indeed "carntfigureitout".
As juvenile as your trolling (of all) is. the
performance can be used for "good".
Yeh. I *know* you "carntfigureitout" and maybe there
are plenty more like you.. there is definitely one, the
mongrel that comes when _anyone_ whistles..!!
/guffaw
Sooo... for you and those others, confused?
I am keeping this short, as I *know* you have the
attention span of a hormonal May Fly...<BFG>
There is a clue in this post:
<00v486509m6gkph8sali30jo8umbasj03o@4ax.com>
That work is in direct response to these posts.
Mid:<3Eggo.93819$Qg.73803@en-nntp-04.dc1.easynews.com>
Mid:<ye6dnaMMAPTtffbRnZ2dnUVZ_u2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
Mid: <xuGdnVqI25fgsB_RnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d@giganews.com>
Nobody is going to "pick up their act"[improve]
when they _believe_ their work is truly appreciated
and of high quality.
Objective valid critique HELPS balance out the BS
posted by gushers like yourself (SF), AND, slowly,
(in ABCP, ever so slowly, dead snail pace even)
evens out the quality of work posted to be acceptable
as something that works.
That is the philosophy.. of Usenet. It should also
apply in Life, however that is another story as losers
and bleeding heart liberals do get folks sucked in.
"Politically Correct" being seen as "nice"... hummph!!!
This example, with you again trolling Herb, allows
voice to what should be plain to you, but isn't.
To wit... Herb wont post binary 'correctly'
and Herb wont post quality digitising because
a.) he is lazy (his own words, by the way)
b.) peasants as yourself will just accept anything
UNTIL THEY CARNT GET IT [or] it
is just not sewable.
The example of effort (Herbs) in correction is within
those MiDs posted.
Herb changed gear, fired up his Agent install, and
_made sure_ the OP (fushtar) got the file.
As an aside...
Unfortunately, as the OP is using Grabit they will
see no text, blundering on never knowing what they
are missing.. there is another learning
curve for many sewing Usenet newbies :-]
The bottom line is.. Herb WANTS to have work
accepted with as little effort on his part as
is humanly possible to expend. The trolling by you
is just not working, sorry for the bad news.
Herb has recently been doing more to get his design
posts at least looking like they will sew.
Firing up Artista, and editing some "Click n Stitch"
digitising, being a strong indicator he is trying
to improve the production.
It is all anyone can do, and all that is ever
asked.... to, "try".
Should those that are indeed interested in preserving
what past posters have established in ABCP continue
to "try", then only good work can come from the efforts
made.
Now....
There are blatant errors in the work you have
posted. I understand you think you are smarter than
those reading your BS, that is a given.. but do you
really rate your eyesight above anyone else also???
You think nobody is going to SEE the misalignment, the
gaps and the poor layering?
I ran that file through an auto-digi process, took me
less than 20minutes, I posted it.. you are very likely
sewing it, on everything!!
Now, it is not something _I_ would ask to be sewn buuut
at least it was halfway presentable!!
AND
AND...
.. 300stitches _less_ than that(!) that(!) that....
monstrosity..!!
You "figureitout"??? :->>>>>>
tip?
When you cease to treat folks here as idiots, genius..
we (you and I) may just find some common ground :-/
bye
--
hopper
|
|
.JPG (0/1)')){kind=link}