On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:54:29 +1000, hopper
<hoÞÞer@forteinc.user-base.net.invalid> wrote:
>Herb <Herb@the.herb.garden>wrote:
>>bates wrote:
>>
>>> PES 4x4
>>
>>OK, you've posted that image 5 times in 25 minutes.
>>
>Yes... somewhat over enthused in GN not displaying the
>original post, I fear <g>
>
>>But it looks like it's already BEEN digitized, in order to get
>>the patch that's seen in the photograph.
>>
>Does indeed look that way.
>
>>To reproduce it from the photograph would require considerable effort
>>on someone's part, including completely re-creating the image.
>>
>Not so.. really, but the results may vary.
>I attach a quick poke at the job.
>
>>would be MUCH easier and quicker to simply buy either the design or
>>the completed patch.
>>
>IF the job was available, yes.
>But is not that exactly what we here (ABCP) are about?
>Getting stuff that is not available?
>
>/scraitches haid
>/confukled
>
>My message to Mr. Bates is that as is the same for all
>requestors.
>More is best when it comes to requests.
>AFAIK no keyboard has ever bitten any operator.
>The keys are not rattler bones..!
>
>My guess is that this job is a military patch.. do I
>have that right?
>
>cheers
Just trying to make a girly patch for my girlfriend.
She saw this and thought it was cute. Not for sale
Did not mean to post so much. Not meaning to offend
just having trouble with a slow computer. Hoping it is not
a virus.
|
|