news:0DvKn.12186$7d5.9340@newsfe17.iad...
"hopper" <Troll5layer@win.win.invalid> wrote in message
news:DnkLm.10649$rE5.2601@newsfe08.iad...
.. at least this is the claim our resident edjut in ABCP makes in this post:
MiD: <ajlqf5tdqt14t4b2odadp0jftcn0r40mbr@4ax.com>
[two swift left clicks on the underlined
link will retrieve the post]
when the edjut asks the question.
<q>
By the wat what is your involvement here?
http://www.sewgirls.com/embroidery/GREAT-OFFER-MORE-THAN-2-MILLION-AMAZING-EMBROIDERY-DESIGNS-8-.htm
You are clearly at the designers side of the line and you were
suspected to be c copyright cop in the past and this kind of confirms
</q>
Now... I myself have been branded "arrogant", and "Troll", by a number
of peeps posting to ABCP over the many many years of my subscription
to ABCP.
Largely I have ignored these accusations and/or aspersions as to my personal
character as I do understand the limitations some face in absorbing the
written word and indeed in many instances the complete "whoosh" noise
my posts make as background noise in the heads of those who have no
interest in Usenet itself, as an information[s] sharing medium in using the
forum
facilities of ABCP (and other like places), only concerned to "get what I
want"
in projecting their own shortcomings into the discussions.
In fact a very small proportion of that percentage actively engage
themselves in
attempts to destroy that which they cannot understand. This is typical
"playground kiddees" behavior and quite understandable, given the
development
obstacles they have failed in achieving solutions for... just one of which
is the
continued use of Browers (Outlook Express and Thunderbird/Netscape) in
reading and posting text messages where a newsreader (Agent) is so much more
proficient and "user friendly" in processing the task.
The reader may then gain some understanding as to why it is I do often wax
lyrical
and *do* often _n o t_ simply "hand over the goods".
Such an attitude can, as said in the heads of some, be construed as
"arrogant" or "trolling.
However...
Much of my work is presented so as to urge the reader to think for
themselves, much
of it is a loose cryptic. Not only is this my UPA, it is also the only way I
have
concluded to have folks _remember_ what they discover.
There is an old quote I have often used as a sig file and one I firmly
believe remains
true for us all.
============================================
We do not cherish that which has not cost us
longing, labour and love
Hons de Belzer 1796
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I am rambling , you think...?
No, not at all.. there is a lesson in those words of Jeans I quote as part
of
his post <ajlqf5tdqt14t4b2odadp0jftcn0r40mbr@4ax.com>, a very important
lesson for those blindly stumbling along in many forums across Usenet today.
And as I do in my earlier post I thank Jean again for the platform to
deliver
that lesson in this message/post of mine today.
I refer directly to this recent post of mine.
I urge one and all to go read the work in its entirety.
In part <kVIKm.15960$ET3.6628@newsfe17.iad> informs
"I just finished writing a post extolling the virtues of your use,
and here you are again delivering Lesson 2 for the day..!
Thankyou... monkieBoi."
The lesson today is not to be aware of those who will stalk any poster
they target across not only Usenet but across any forum anywhere they
can find their target offering comment.
The lesson today is not to be wary of clicking on URLs provided in Usenet
posts.
The lesson today is not to take with a grain of salt that which known
malcontents/miscreants will post in their work[loose use] to discredit
excellent members of a community.
In fact the lesson today is not any defence of any accusation Jean directs
my way.
I accept Jeans question as being genuine confusion.
Jean does not know, Jean will benefit from the lesson.
As thick as Jean is, he will follow the lesson as fervently as his obsession
drives him to stalk those he is jealous of... and yearns to mimick.
The lesson today is for everyone else, as I myself learnt the lesson long
ago and to
this day use that lesson (manipulate it, if you like) as part of my
UPA - Usenet Performance Art) in presenting what I wish where.
The lesson is not difficult to follow, it is no big deal as an extra task in
posting.
It may well be impossible with Browers but in a newsreader it is a simple
"tick the box" thing, easily toggled.
Ahh.. I hear.. WTF is this lesson..?.. "get to the point Man..!"
Sorry,, you the reader need to remember this lesson and remember it well.
Soooo... I ask. Why is it Jean is today able to stalk a WWW site to discover
'information' Jean will then use in a Usenet post to connect the posters
mentioned
to his implied accusation I (hopper) am a "copyright cop"????
Look at the profile of these posters he connects, ask yourself.. are
these "copyright cops"..????.. they all appear on the site my posts are on,
they
must be.. right..?.
Jean says posters on that site are "clearly at the designers side of the
line ".
These people:
<snckleFritz> aka <carntfigureitout>
Fritz joined ABCP in August 2004 posting as <carntfigureitout>.
In early posts Fritz described herself as a younger Mother of three(IIRC)
and a qualified Nurse working with kids who had ADD and other ailments of
the head. Considering herself educated and qualified in "mental health"
Fritz choose a path to join with a known Troll of that time , one
GymmyBob/John Bengi.. and thus, still today, is well despised by many
here in ABCP as a clueless git with a very poor attitude.
Fritz today still "carntfigureitout" buuut one of the "copyright cops" who
haunt ABCP..?.. no fskn way..!
The woman has not got the smarts. Believe that.
<noone99>
n99 is a nondescript, possibly very wise and clued up poster.
Little can be said about that Lady other than the observation her posts
are always there, conforming, and most appreciative of work shared.
Definitely not the work of one of the "copyright cops".
<Pogonip>
An "English rose" as they say,, Pogonip is one very stoppy Pommie
lass,, I recommend none cross her <g>.
On the positive side Pogonip is always there with a helpful hint, quick
to redirect misinformation back to the Truth and I would offer a
genuinely "good sport".
Definitely not the attributes of one of the ABCP "copyright cops".
Soooo.. why..??... WHY are these peeps all posting on that site
Jean points to??
Discover.. and find the lesson.
... good luck in your travels :-)
--
fup set to ABCP
Here I thought fungal was part of my flock of names I used, once upon a
time.
Could I be in error?
ahhh, back to Taz or GymmyBob soon!
cheers
--
hopper
|
|