On Sat, 08 May 2010 15:57:08 +1000, hopper
>Pixie <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com.invalid>wrote:
>>On Fri, 07 May 2010 21:51:09 -0500, sassy <sassysan@charter.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 07 May 2010 19:21:23 -0700, Herb <Herb@the.herb.garden> wrote:
>>>
>>>>sassy wrote:
>>>>> This is for the ladies in the Building blocks playgroup.
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>>I am sorry, and I thank you for being considerate and explaining
>>>proper etiquette instead of just flaming me.
>>>
>>Flaming is a little extreme!
>>You will see this is not so when you figure out just who is who you
>>are talking to.
>
>/snip
>
>.. and I did not bother reading the rest, sorry :-<
>
Yeah, I got that... /grin...
Prolly just as well! You are not fond of hand holding!
>You waste your time with this one.
>
But not with others who may find themselves in this situation.
Buying an embroidery machine is a ticket to a lifetime of slavery if
one is not careful!
If one is going to get themselves chained to the machine for others,
then one needs to accept it from the get go and not rope others into
the chain gang!
>Sassy is playing games. Another one that believes
>members of ABCP are as braindead as her dog.
>
Usenet is not a Yahoo handholding group session... no.
You've given worse misdemeanours a second chance... mehehe.
>NOBODY has flamed anyone here for months!
>
True... you put up a fine example of just what flaming really is...
Not one to mix your metaphors is you... /grin
>.. and to claim such is just plain pig ignorant.
>
The benchmark for flaming seems to be a grey area, agreed!
A stint in AFN or the Sandpit may help the Newbs in their quest for
what a real flame looks like??!!
How the group moves forward with this, I do not know.
A distinct lack of information is offered when making requests, yet
"I didn't know" is always the excuse.
We get that. The "I didn't know" bit.
If one doesn't "know", one should ask in a manner that will elicit a
positive response.
>/waves
>
Pixie :-))
|
|