holita <holita@dog.com>wrote:
<>
>wrote in <viKAn.77576$iG7.76892@en-nntp-12.dc1.easynews.com>
/restore
[..]
>
>>He also used the opportunity to post advice as feedback
>>that is not entirely correct. Advice which will lead
>>you to producing inferior work for folks.
>>As "unfair" as that is, it is the way this person works
>>in creating confusion and disruption. He is skilled at
>>destroying newsgroups. And this is what he does
>>"on the Internet", all he does in fact.
>>I know him very very well. He has good reason to be
>>very frightened (word?) of myself.
>>
>>Your post, I copy below, has him falling off his chair
>>laughing.
>>+++++++++++++++++++
>>i'm a beginning digitizer & spend a lot of time pathing
>>out my designs
>>to avoid jump atitches. i never thought of doing the
>>toes the way
>>hopper did. i should have done the fingers the same
>>way.
>>
>>this has been a good learning experience for me. i'm
>>looking forward
>>to another digitizing opportunity here.
>>++++++++++++++++++
>>
>>I am not going to ask you to react to his 'evil'.
>>I am not asking you to support *me* in ridding ABCP of
>>this person.
>>I am not going to ask you to do more than you already
>>have done or will do, as you grow at your own pace.
/snip
>>
>>Pressing the H key whilst reading this post in Agent
>>will give you a "full headers" view in Agent.
>>Ticking "Show all header fields" in the "Message"
>>dialog will show the full headers permanently for every
>>post you read.
>>
>>Where you see the header lines shown below you will
>>*know* it is not I, the genuine "hopper", posting.
>>Right now you can prove what I say by reviewing some of
>>the "hopper posts" you have read. Read more and you
>>will see the pattern continually repeated.
>>
>>These lines come from a forgery my fanboi has posted.
>>
>>????????????????????????????????????????????
>>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
>>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
>>V6.00.2900.5579
>>X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com
>>?????????????????????????????????????????????
>>
>>
>>Posts authored by me will always have these lines.
>>
>>_______________________
>>
>>X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English
>>(0rstrelehan)
>>X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
>>
>>or for archive posting, these lines;
>>
>>X-Complaints-To: abuse@sonic-news.com
>>X-Newsposter: SharkPost
>>v1.0Build20030724.3.EXPERIMENTAL
>>________________________
>>
>>.. anything else and you are reading a forgery.
>
>
>in short, you've said that there's a 'good' hopper & a 'bad' hopper
>and you've told me how to tell the difference.
>
>
....mmmm ...... an' over simplification, m'dear.
What I have *done* is show you how to identify a post
of my making.
I have pointed to forgery.
I have not said "good and bad".
Such a determination is subjective, and not _my_
prerogative.
Read enough posts and you will determine stuff for
yourself.. as any thinking adult will do.
Any concern I have is for the NG, the interaction which
keeps ABCP viable.
In that respect my "heads up" is about you, not I.
You and your interaction.
Post as you wish. I simply provide the information
which should enable you to *know* to whom you are
responding.
Long term this will help the NG in doing what it does.
Something extra in parting?
Always include at least some of the post you are
responding to, and the attribution.
This helps those reading the post to identify the
poster you are responding to and the points you are
discussing.
I posted an expanded explanation of this for Pixie,
here:
MiD:<1e7An.213134$Up1.46832@en-nntp-09.dc1.easynews.com>
Thank you for what you can do :-)
--
hopper
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|