cherryade<@blossom.com>, wrote
>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:50:37 +1000, hopper
><Troll5layer@acting.invalid> wrote:
/snipT
>>thank you for listening.
>
>thank you for your post. I am not as eloquent as you so this is a
>short note. I had not seen Herb's solution to BR posts, thanks for
>that.I did not used to thank anyone at for anything, but that seems to
>put new posters off. So untill next time a small pretty please ease up
>for now or you will end up with a heart attack or worse and as you are
>very helpful putting usall in the know. thanks again
>cherryade
>>
It is not a "usual case", this BR thing, CA.
There is a reason BR is doing what IT is doing.
And BR is not saying what that reason is.
I assumed you knew BR has been posting corrupt
uploads for months. Seems I had that bit wrong.
Thanking people for posting crap helps nobody, including
the genuine potentially good poster who knows no better.
A small tip to take with you?
Posting "thankyou" after a set of designs is in itself a security risk.
It is best to use another service away from that used to download
to do so.
It would be a rare thing for someone not to appreciate a
"thankyou".. jes make sure everyone is "safe" in doing so.
Mee?
Everyone has a "hobby", well ok.. "most people".
This is mine.. I see the humour in all of this and often sit
here smiling at those on the other end of the message.
Where others fail to see that I do _try_ to show the way
forward.. but David Letterman I am not, nor do I subscribe
to [0n] sound bytes of canned laughter so the audience knows
when to laugh.
It is this simple.
Some listen, some do not.. that is Usenet.
I haint bustin' no foof-foo valve over it<g>
cheers.. and stay safe :-)
|
|