On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:39:41 +1000, hopper
<Troll5layer@acting.invalid> wrote:
>Really..!..just where is the problem, the source..?..!
>You seeing the reflection from your screen?
>
>Despite all the *bad* experiences reported here and elsewhere
>of those dump groups being a playground for the likes of Jean(et al)
>you go and download from there anyway!!
>
>Tell you something for nothing, sweetcheeks, IF you must
>dabble in such [mal]practice then take the first step and
>get yourself educated on malware recognition so you have half
>a chance of knowing _yourself_ if what you have so fervently
>grabbed is of any use , at all :-.
>Anything else is just as dumb a position to hold as that your
>post/s reflect you currently sit with!!
>
>Two places to start are :
><alt.comp.virus>
>http://www.kaspersky.com/threats
>No argument.. IF you must rely on software (anywhere)
>to scan and provide "click..n.go" security then *nothing*
>else is going to serve you better than KAS.. long term.
>
>
>You have already compromised one computer so
>before you do anything else you best at least see if that box
>is "leaking" .
>https://www.grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2
>
>AND.
>Embroidery software distributed today by "House"
>today is at best merely "clagged up" to prevent
>folks from using "cracked software".
>Improvements claimed are superficial at best.
>You do not _need_ PE6, nor PE7.
>Brother software being what it is there is much to
>be gained in looking at other choices.
>There is the reasoning behind a series of posts in:
><alt.binaries.dominion.moms.computer>
>IF you must there is a working copy of PE5 in
>those uploads.
>GN will carry <abdmc>, look for "Packed and posted".
>
>You are quite correct in what you think.. I did not
>put a lot of effort into this post.. too many times has your
>brand of naivety proved "locked in".
Why are you so mean?
|
|