wlg <gonefishin@thelake.com> wrote in
news:gonefishin-CC1BFD.20282726092008@unknown.ams.astraweb.com:
> In article <Xns9B246AB7DB3D8maildecom@216.40.28.70>, abe <mail@de.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote in
>> news:476md49s4b9419db5ldl19p19q93nadat9@4ax.com:
>>
>> > On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:17:46 +0200, wlg <gonefishin@thelake.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>In article <Xns9B23D6109F2B6mailmailde@216.40.28.71>, abe
>> >><mail@de.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> wlg <gonefishin@thelake.com> wrote in news:gonefishin-
>> >>> 9A8ACB.16493124092008@unknown.ams.astraweb.com:
>> >>>
>> >>> > In article <Xns9B23697E030E0om@216.40.28.72>, abe <mail@de.com>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> Who could post the rest of this boy?
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Please, please
>> >>> >> thanks, thanks
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> begin 644 piccolo_1 (100).JPG
>> >>> >> [Image]
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> end
>> >>> >
>> >>> > He's at least 45 years old now.
>> >>>
>> >>> Not in my mind, dude... that's the first reply, the second reply
>> >>> is: fuck you!
>> >>>
>> >>> And I could insult you another 500 words, but I'm not in the
>> >>> mood, so piss off
>> >>
>> >>My singular point, which you appear to be too obtuse to understand,
>> >>is that Piccolo was publishing sometime in the early 70s, and if
>> >>there are any more pictures of that lad, they aren't readily
>> >>available. Lighten up.
>> >
>> > Spunky feller --- full a' beans, ain't he?
>> >
>> > Law that is Unjust is not Law.
>>
>>
>> Uh, for the life of me, Ted, I haven't a clue what you're talking
>> about.
>> But I'll keep my anger for now.
>>
>> I have to talk however about my "singular point". My singular point,
>> wlg,
>> is that you are a fucking idiot. A royal fucking idiot. And no
>> without reason, because:
>> point 1 : I myself remember very well the other pictures of this
>> boy, and
>> also having seen them not many time ago
>> point 2 : they belong to the acclaimed serie fkk, who served as
>> pretext
>> for the masturbation of thousands and thousands people, along the
>> years and the distance, from the 70s to the, uh, new century.
>> point 3 : if we have to take for granted your word, it means that
>> the 70s
>> production is going to be partially or totally lost in a few years,
>> and so will do the actual production in some decades. But then, why
>> the fuck God invented the computers? Sure not only for you could
>> write your brilliant comments.
>> point 4 : I assume my fault for requesting pictures to a bunch of
>> lurkers
>> like me. But, if no positive result was expected, what it was not
>> expeced is gathering the opinion of a joker (or a yokel, i could say)
>> like you. That's the bad thing about democracy, I guess.
>>
>>
>> And that's my singular point. Fuck off, bytheway, and grow up.
>>
>> Ps. I like this boy, if you didn't notice.
>
> If you are right about the fkk set, which one? May I assume you are
> talking about jppfk? Other postings as "fkk" were simply scans from
> Jeune et Naturale,(or English or German versions) as far as I know.
> Those old pictures aren't lost, but you can bet your ass
my ass again? is this like some kind of fixation?
> that no one
> is going to post them for someone who deals in insults and name
> calling.
name calling? wowow. For your information they're not going to post any
way, so, what the hell? I write like I feel, could you accuse me of being
dishonest? This group is full of nice opportunist lurkers, I'm sincerely
rude. Anyway I don't mind very much if I don't get the pictures, you see,
my lust comes and goes. Look for example the second boy I posted, a half
drugged asiatic boy being employed for strictly sexual profit, mmmm
And the series, yes, fkk I said. Not scans from Jen, but maybe from piccolo
magazines, if you have any interest to know. Fkk boy series, several boys
serially pictured, one boy one number, from the 001 to the 115, I guess, or
perhaps more. The boy in question, I could dare to say he's between the 60
and the 80. Incomplete series in many collections.
|
|