| Re: Bad quality, but still... |
|
| \"Reb\" Ruster (rebruster@hotmail.com) |
2009/01/30 18:38 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!news.astraweb.com!border1.newsrouter.astraweb.com!feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-04.inet.qwest.net!195.114.241.41.MISMATCH!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.erje.net!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!demorgan.zen.co.uk!nx02.iad.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.140.MISMATCH!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:38:47 -0600
From: "\"Reb\" Ruster" <rebruster@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.chakotay
Subject: Re: Bad quality, but still...
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:38:28 -0500
Message-ID: <opa7o45aplomd7j5ccffr105ikrkmrfss9@4ax.com>
References: <UsKdndF_Appf5h7UnZ2dnUVZ8g6WnZ2d@giganews.com> <000e3a62$0$2118$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.0/32.1071
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 25
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-x5AR+S5HUThSu01wBxqHSLQh/sK7JbwR15u6K4rCVV/qaQCKW1APRTxceB1feu/1yiD7mgMvc42oPHy!buPpQCCGRzQaubpdRJMZrYowKm/o0zK3PU/Ln4HAvHcZ6JaXNRYO/2/GnKNj0udkN/H7Y0I=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.39
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.chakotay:1718
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:05:34 -0800, "icicle" <icicle@NorthPole.com>
wrote:
>
>"Showers" <no-one@nowhere.net> wrote in message
> news:UsKdndF_Appf5h7UnZ2dnUVZ8g6WnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>I think you'll want to see this:
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6A6qC0_ysU
>>
>> Regards,
>>
> Lol! I think your referenced video has been already
>pulled by youtube.
> Here's a little cute boy dancer that probably won't
>be pulled by youtube:
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnBwBk13Xco&feature=related
>
>icicle
>
"This video has been removed due to terms of use violation. "
Right! Well, YouTube most likely banned it for nudity. It wouldn't
have been the Little Boy Dancer nudist on stage video would it?
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|
|