alt.binaries.chakotayShow header Prev. Next
Re: Bad quality, but still...
\"Reb\" Ruster (rebruster@hotmail.com) 2009/01/30 18:38

On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:05:34 -0800, "icicle" <icicle@NorthPole.com>
wrote:

>
>"Showers" <no-one@nowhere.net> wrote in message
> news:UsKdndF_Appf5h7UnZ2dnUVZ8g6WnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>I think you'll want to see this:
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6A6qC0_ysU
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>  Lol!  I think your referenced video has been already
>pulled by youtube.
>   Here's a little cute boy dancer that probably won't
>be pulled by youtube:
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnBwBk13Xco&feature=related
>
>icicle
>

"This video has been removed due to terms of use violation. "

Right! Well, YouTube most likely banned it for nudity. It wouldn't
have been the Little Boy Dancer nudist on stage video would it?

Follow-ups:12345678910111213
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite