Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!news.astraweb.com!border2.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
From: "Johnny Mudd Mudman" <JMM@themuddhole.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.chakotay
References: <003e9c51$0$18369$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <Xns9B80DF132DAD9dubbleUbush@216.196.109.144> <004096ed$0$8492$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <0049ea45$0$19036$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>
In-Reply-To: <0049ea45$0$19036$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>
Subject: Re: Clean but cute
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 11:40:05 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.16480
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16669
Lines: 67
Message-ID: <005c7078$0$24179$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 63dc4697.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=2cDA^a@?<?S7HkD[4f_4]SL?0kYOcDh@ZTG5oCeeJ@lYd;_adYg@LCSXLSA7Gn03W_eh:RYYYf`[_64^dJk?7aSS
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.chakotay:1435
"sisterofmercy" <som@dominion.gov> wrote in message
news:0049ea45$0$19036$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
> While I will whole-heartedly agree with "cute", if my son came home and
> said
> "Look what uncle Plumduff and I made today...it's a nice, CLEAN, video for
> you!" I would have to question my son, and consequently uncle Plumduff,
> about how exactly they would define "clean" as it relates to this video.
>
> I would have to ask about 42 seconds into the video where it looks like he
> was teasing the viewer by lifting his shirt in a way that suggested
> stripping.
>
> I would have to ask about 53 seconds through 1:11 where it became obvious
> that what I thought was a tease was actually the boy's realization that he
> could not easy remove the shirt because it was buttoned too high and then
> he
> loses it all together after twirling it.
>
> I would ask about 1:28 where it was clear he really wasn't teasing with
> his
> belt either and he loses the pants to show a form-fitting pair of greay
> briefs.
>
> I would probably reserve comment on the crotch-eye-view camera shots of
> his
> very mild hip girations and instead ask why, when he lay on the bed, did
> he
> feel it "clean" to turn his buttocks toward the camera as he did.
>
>
> I would say that I thought the slow-motion roll of his hips to the
> close-up
> of his still briefed crotch was perhaps artful, but nonetheless question
> the
> label of "clean" there as well.
>
> Ar 2:14, when he removed the briefs to show his black thong, I pretty much
> gave up on the idea that you reall meant it when you said "clean", but I
> was
> so entertained, I had to keep watching to see how completely off mark the
> label really was.
>
> When he bent over on the bed, head to the mattress, butt in the air, and
> showed a dangling scrotum, I worried that you had purposely misled us all
> into thinking we could just download this video and, site unseen, burn it
> to
> a video compilation DVD that we could take to our local senior center to
> give them a heart-warming look at the innocent but beautiful youth of our
> world today.
>
> Perhpas you can imagine how relieved I was that I had not done this at
> 3:30
> when this beutiful boy, obvsiously erect under the thong, began to roll
> around seductively, scrotum still half exposed, as his softly stroked his
> mostly naked body to the slow rhythm of the music in the background. The
> nipple play was certainly about and beyond the call, as was the subsequent
> soft stroke of his butt.
>
> I'll be watching this again a few more times to see if I missed anything.
While I think sisterofmercy's post was a *little* bit over the top, I have
to agree that
while I was watching I laughed to myself that the video was labelled as cute
and clean :)
I'm not offended by it, but I have to question the OPs definition of "clean"
|
|