Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Puffer Belly <anonymous@anonymous.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.beatles
Subject: Re: REQ: Puffer Belly: Servers with 6 yr. retention - really? Name them & Back it up (0/1)
Message-ID: <st98va5em4enhafi63nong96vcnhj2113b@4ax.com>
References: <B-adnYQH_6LAS2_InZ2dnUU7-aGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 46
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:22:49 -0500
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4031266344
X-Received-Bytes: 3151
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.beatles:169
The program I use is Forte's Agent 8.0. I use Forte's Usenet service,
and they use Easynews as their Usenet service connection. My headers
for this Beatles newsgroup start at 9/14/2008 and there is no
fragmentation being detected.
Many of the NZB search websites don't cover minor newsgroups, and that
includes Beatle newsgroups, unfortunately. That's why loading all
headers and then searching the headers are usually required. Attached
are NZB files I created with Agent of the most recent postings in two
different newsgroups. If there are NZB search websites better than
http://binsearch.info and http://www.nzbindex.nl please tell me what
they are. I've found Google Groups to be pretty worthless, but maybe
I'm using it incorrectly.
This is the BBC show I remember hearing on American radio in 1973 and
again in 1981. I recently listened to it again in 2014 on a 2-day car
trip and it is complete. If these files doesn't work for you, then
there are others in multiple Beatle newsgroups.
I don't like posting files that are readily available. It's a waste
of bandwidth and server space. However, if these NZB files don't work
for you, I can try a few other postings, and as a last resort, I will
post it myself.
PB
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:25:49 -0500, Rely <Rely@now.com> wrote:
>Better yet,
>
>YOU name the program you use, not the one you're shilling for.
>YOU retreive a full set of files for this with NO fragmentation (or reassembled via quikpars).
>Then post it here along with a .nzb for the original set you grabbed - not your repost -
>so others can try it out.
>
>That I'd like to see.
>
>Annabella,
>I've been wrong many times before & this may be one of them but in my experience
>ANY file set that old is likely so fragmented as to be useless. Just 'cause someone
>can spot it via binsearch or somesuch program does not mean it's recoverable. So
>if Puffer Belly can do as I asked I'll be happy to apologize but until then don't waste
>your time chasing 6 yr. old files. It can be done but 90%+ positive they're gone.
>Spammers often do follow-up posts to requests like yours when their real goal is too
>sell programs, not to help you.
>FWIW, andrew
|
|