looskeelooah <looskeelooah@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Considering the author has admitted that it is not accurate in many places
>[LIES] it should be an amusing palace intrigue tale. No person who follows
>politics closely and seriously believes it's contents are anywhere near
>authentic.
>It should be good for some laughs.
"Not accurate" is not necessairly a lie. Anything from someone that wasn't
there depends on stories from those that were. There are many famous
experiments that show that "eye witnesses" are seldom accurate.
I consider myself very serious about politics and have not found the book at
all laughable. Quite the contrary, I've, so far, found it horribly appalling.
Freddie
|
|