I find Hurc to be less irritating than you two nit wits. Not a thing to say
and determined to tell it to as many people as you can cross post it to.
PLONK both of you............
Bob
news:qdbqa113sl0fioc94k88tinqkpbdt0f53c@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 02:47:49 -0400, Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>><http://img106.echo.cx/img106/5117/kenshlockdelafohrtt2vr.jpg> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 02:10:42 -0400, Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>><http://img106.echo.cx/img106/5117/kenshlockdelafohrtt2vr.jpg> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 23:51:26 -0400, Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 22:05:49 -0400, trainfan1
>>>>>><lmsearing@usdatanet.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:55:42 -0700, Spike <jma@snowcrest.net>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If my sources are correct - herc ast is done. :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Interesting - he has been quieted by someone...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Do tell us the trick!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Rob
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I have no confirmation but last night I sent two emails, one a
>>>>>>detailed complaint to his ISP, the second a request to block his
>>>>>>access to just about every server on the net. Whether my request(s)
>>>>>>were acted upon or his absence is a coincidence I cannot say because I
>>>>>>don't know. I've not had so much as an acknowledgement from his ISP
>>>>>>and my source is not in the habit of responding after the fact. The
>>>>>>problem just disappears. If the latter has been successful 'herc
>>>>>>ast' is going to find it very difficult finding access to the net.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Peace and quiet. :)
>>>>>
>>>>>Poor Sarah, still trying to be a netkkkop are we? Give it up, dear, I
>>>>>suspect that every NSP's abuse desk has blocked you from mailing them
>>>>>with your frivolous complaints. You're a troll and an abuser, there's
>>>>>no reason that any abuse person would do anything but laugh at you.
>>>>>HTH
>>>>
>>>>We'll talk KMan when when you can come back through APN using my
>>>>name and email addy. To your immense chagrin we both know why you
>>>>can't do that. Maybe you won't be a complete waste of protoplasm if you
>>>>advise your fellow pest 'herc ast' not to follow your loopy escapades
>>>>of
>>>>losing 4 internet accounts before your reptilian brain figured it
>>>>out...?
>>>>Why don't you give it a try, Goofball. :)
>>
>>
>>>SPANK!
>>
>>Yes you were, KMan. When you come back as defined we'll talk,
>>Goofball. :)
>>
> But Sarah, dear, you are the one who claims to have had me banned for
> life from APN. While it's a fact that you've never been able to read
> headers, even someone as simple as yourself could see the fault in
> your logic :)
> Funnily enough I haven't been billed to this very day for my news
> service through them. Doesn't really fit in with your extravagant
> claims now, does it. But then Czepiel and Reality never were on
> nodding terms with each other, were they.
|
|