Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: el_pup98@yahoo.com (RJ)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.brady-bunch
Subject: Re: Brady Bunch Financial Question
Date: 21 Oct 2003 03:12:47 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <3ac7f5e5.0310210212.b11268@posting.google.com>
References: <3ac7f5e5.0310190259.4043bdda@posting.google.com> <20031020013749.07126.00000437@mb-m21.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.216.160.116
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1066731168 28296 127.0.0.1 (21 Oct 2003 10:12:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 10:12:48 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.tv.brady-bunch:428
saggiediaperz@aol.com (Saggiediaperz) wrote in message news:<20031020013749.07126.00000437@mb-m21.aol.com>...
> >Saggie, depending on your gender, how do YOU know that sanitary
> >napkins are cheaper at warehouses???
>
> el_pup98 - you caught me red-handed (gee, that's funny with a discussion of
> sanitary napkins - ha!). Yes. I work for a special force that brainwashes
> people to buy their sanitary napkins at the warehouse where they are much much
> lower in price
A pox upon me Saggie, for being so sarcastic, as your eloquent
explanation of your first post now proves to me that you ARE a
sanitary napkin price czar!
> If everyone just used one more sanitary napkin per month, we could pull the
> entire state of California out of the financial mess it's in. Notice for
> example, as long as the Brady women were buying sanitary napkins California
> NEVER had a budget shortfall!
Brilliant!
But one bothering aspect for me is, that you held the solution for
California's financial woes, and yet you never thought to run for
governor. WHY??
|
|