alt.surrealismPrev. Next
Re: Elag...concrete art blueyonder (post doesn't ..
Paul Heslop (paul.heslop@blueyonder.co.uk) 2003/07/16 02:14

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3F150949.8AAC8187@blueyonder.co.uk>
From: Paul Heslop <paul.heslop@blueyonder.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.surrealism
Subject: Re: Elag...concrete art
References: <3ED605C1.E74C1DD1@blueyonder.co.uk> <3EF3C60E.69A95CE5@blueyonder.co.uk> <3EF51BC0.8BF1524A@cloud9.net> <3EF59E92.EEFF4660@blueyonder.co.uk> <3EF91ED1.F26F9407@cloud9.net> <3EF9FC7D.F55EF8AA@blueyonder.co.uk> <3EFD28DD.1D9217C2@cloud9.net> <3EFE19FA.670B028B@blueyonder.co.uk> <3EFE5BD6.1EC68444@cloud9.net> <3EFEF6E5.6830CF0F@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F019029.B22C7AC0@cloud9.net> <3F01D920.89EDD995@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F0530B8.8E548A@cloud9.net> <3F05BBC3.F90B4B6D@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F065F01.F53D2C79@cloud9.net> <3F06B959.C46A9A1A@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F0A2FB7.C807EC77@cloud9.net> <3F0A3C01.E29C957C@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F0B33BA.9248B1D@cloud9.net> <3F0B4338.7BF1FD57@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F0C87DF.BB56E3D8@cloud9.net> <3F0C8BBD.3B52FA36@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F0DD247.5DBCFE6E@cloud9.net> <3F0DFA3A.D21DF905@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F10E7F9.2D8A85BE@cloud9.net> <3F110C39.98B47CD2@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F124CE2.C8C5AB40@cloud9.net> <3F1338F4.B3A87C01@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F14B7F4.4D8C9C8A@cloud9.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 26
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 08:14:03 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.39.104.77
X-Complaints-To: abuse@blueyonder.co.uk
X-Trace: news-text.cableinet.net 1058343243 82.39.104.77 (Wed, 16 Jul 2003 09:14:03 BST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 09:14:03 BST
Organization: blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.surrealism:117

elag wrote:
>
> Paul Heslop wrote:
> >
> > elag wrote:
> > >
> ....
>
> > > I thought they would have to be open, but I was wondering if they used
> > > some thin material invisible to the wavelength being received.  I've
> > > read that this is possible...
> > >
> > I couldn't see anything on that square one that looked as if it would
> > open, so I am going to assume they've found a way to have them work
> > closed.
>
> I have seen pics of cloth dish covers so it seems signal can be recieved
> through some opaque materials.

That's what they make the camouflage out of, just painted/printed with
brick or whatever.
--
 Paul. (This machine will, will not communicate)
 --------------------------------------------------------------
 Not what it seems...
 http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/

Follow-ups:1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859
60616263
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite