| Re: <MK> Do you have CSV's you could post for M-A please? Thanks |
EasyNews, UseNet made Ea .. |
| The Indexxer (now!6700!@index.es) |
2006/08/30 12:57 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: The Indexxer <now!6700!@index.es>
Newsgroups: alt.funk-you
Subject: Re: <MK> Do you have CSV's you could post for M-A please? Thanks
Message-ID: <1jlbf2p1n1g33l8bcvpgdohvn3hevk0sc1@4ax.com>
References: <Xns982DE70F71C2Fnonononono@62.253.170.163> <rbq6f2pvjguuv7je4qc40utusk5utookmt@4ax.com> <Xns982DEC9E46B82nonononono@62.253.170.163> <0001HW.C11AFAD20149220BF0284530@news.easynews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 50
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:57:53 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.funk-you:1687
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:20:05 GMT, dreamer <dreamer@weaver.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:13:22 -0400, Jo wrote
>(in message <Xns982DEC9E46B82nonononono@62.253.170.163>):
>
>> MinoriFan wrote in news:rbq6f2pvjguuv7je4qc40utusk5utookmt@4ax.com:
>>
>>> http://csv.el-toro.org/
>>>
>>> MET collections are available on el-toros. Unfortunately, the site is
>>> down at the moment, but should be up fairly soon. (day or two,
>>> hopefully.)
>>>
>>
>> OK,thanks a lot.
>> Jo.
>
>i'm most likely going to get slammed by someone out there for saying this,
>but it still amazes me that people thank people for csv's but say nothing of
>thanks regarding the posts, (not that I expect people to thank posters for
>every single post) but thanking for a csv and not evening thanks for the post
>just floors me, and if you like csvs better than the sets well do hope you
>get all the csvs you need, who needs the pics
I generally think that posters receive by far too less thanks. In the
case of "non requested" sets (sets that the poster posts "freely",
without request, because he thinks they might be interesting for the
public) too many people take them for granted and not worth the
trouble posting a short "Thank you" note. This is a big problem in
nearly all groups and I've seen dozens of great posters disappear
because they did not receive proper appreciation. Maybe some folks
think "Nobody asked for these sets so why should I thank for them"?
In the past I always have reduced my postings to a minimum in case I
got no answers and have increased postings when I had the feeling that
people appreciated them. In case of personal requests I always expect
a reply of the requester then - even if it's only an information. In
case I do not receive an acknowledgement this person will not get help
from me any more.
Most interesting is the fact that when postings of regulars cease the
lurkers creep out from their holes and are amazed where the posters
now are - but they never had thanked them for their posts before.
I generally thank posters when I download a set or more, I also
mention what I thank for because I do not download all sets. Dreamer,
your work is very appreciated, and compared to other groups this one
and the sister group has a relatively high rate of thankful people.
The Indexxer
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|
|