On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 9:29:44 -0400, Jo wrote
(in message <Xns982F945696B6nonononono@80.5.182.99>):
> dreamer wrote in news:0001HW.C11AFAD20149220BF0284530@news.easynews.com:
>
>> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:13:22 -0400, Jo wrote
>> (in message <Xns982DEC9E46B82nonononono@62.253.170.163>):
>>
>>> MinoriFan wrote in news:rbq6f2pvjguuv7je4qc40utusk5utookmt@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> http://csv.el-toro.org/
>>>>
>>>> MET collections are available on el-toros. Unfortunately, the site
>>>> is down at the moment, but should be up fairly soon. (day or two,
>>>> hopefully.)
>>>>
>>>
>>> OK,thanks a lot.
>>> Jo.
>>
>> i'm most likely going to get slammed by someone out there for saying
>> this, but it still amazes me that people thank people for csv's but
>> say nothing of thanks regarding the posts, (not that I expect people
>> to thank posters for every single post) but thanking for a csv and not
>> evening thanks for the post just floors me, and if you like csvs
>> better than the sets well do hope you get all the csvs you need, who
>> needs the pics
>
> I do say thanks for the posts when I ask for and receive them, I have
> noticed that some posters have changed the naming of collections,
> presumably to avoid complaints from the owners, ie analog nightmare boys,
> so I naturally assume that they might not want dozens of thank yous
> highlighting their names from people who haven't made requests.
>
>
> All contributions are appreciated from me at least.
--
dreamer
*******
Practice random kindness
and senseless acts of beauty
I have to admit you made a very valid point about some posters not wanting
thanks... another side I should definitely keep in mind. Yes I have seen you
thank me in the past. No harm meant and hope none taken.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|