Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!t3!artnm!t3!feeder.news-service.com!news.k-dsl.de!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: jeanpauljesus <jeanpauljesus@heaven.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy
Subject: Re: A Friendly Warning to astraweb users
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:47:27 +0200 (CEST)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <gaui8g$1r8$1@aioe.org>
References: <6d241681f61c97a400c5386185f578fa@dizum.com>
<0mmtc4pkduo43kebh458o85prc6f7jmeal@4ax.com>
<Xns9B1B5E12D52FAutb@208.90.168.18>
<4n6vc457ks6ak7911ue3sjb9n2bprv5k2v@4ax.com> <gapgns$9k7$1@aioe.org>
<Xns9B1C6AB3336BAutb@208.90.168.18>
NNTP-Posting-Host: QcaAenwZJFg6OOVTniCHTg.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-No-Archive: Yes
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy:1838
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:29:20 +0000, Naughty Boy wrote:
> jeanpauljesus <jeanpauljesus@heaven.com> wrote in
> news:gapgns$9k7$1@aioe.org:
>
>> Have to agree with Vlad there.
>>
>> I'm always amazed how otherwise rational people cannot see that
>> resources devoted to chasing what should be low priority bogies are
>> resources that cannot be spent on truly high priority issues.
>>
>> The reason they cannot see this is because their claims to "protect"
>> children in this way are - whether they are aware of this or not,
>> usually not - actually come from their arbitrary morality and terror
>> about sex and sexuality, and not so much from rational analysis of
>> actual risks to children, especially in the case of boys. Yet
>> pedophiles are the ones who are supposed to exhibit "cognitive
>> distortion" (!).
>>
>> And of course, we have seen research that questions the assumptions and
>> claims of the CA industry censured and its authors professionally
>> ostracized - that's where such research isn't outright buried to begin
>> with, that is. Why bother listening to that which you don't agree
>> with?
>>
>> The assumption that photographing a child nude will "harm" children is
>> a case in point. That assumption has been extended by the CA Industry
>> to include a whole range of images that, until a few years ago, were
>> never seen as "indecent" at all. It's arbitrary, and entirely
>> culturally determined.
>>
>> But you're wasting your time Vlad on NB - he's just a troll and just
>> spews whatever. I never read his posts.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> More dissembling from another sick pedo. Thanks for proving the article
> right.
Typical. I must go back to not reading you posts. They never contain any
actual analysis or argument, because you're too lazy and probably just
too stupid to think anything through. You never actually respond to
anything. You're just a low ranking and fairly unimaginative troll. You
could just as easily be trolling on any other topic using the same weak,
lazy approach - I doubt you actually have any real passion or feeling
about anything. You just have nothing better to do than vent your
frustration here, fighting the big bad pedos, oooh scary.
You're too small minded to see that some of these beliefs espoused by the
idoit Brandon have implications that extend far beyond society's handling
of pedophilia, such as the desire to detain and/or prosecute people for
what they *might* do, a fundamental breach of basic principles in a free
society.
Bah.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|