| Re: Do boylovers hurt boys? Yes, no, maybe ? |
EasyNews, UseNet made Ea .. |
| the non (myaddress@server.co) |
2007/06/29 02:19 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!s02-b63!textbe01-phx!hwmnpeer02.phx!hw-filter.phx!hwmnpeer01.phx!hwmnpeer01.lga!news.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!easynews-local!fe03.news.easynews.com.POSTED!myaddress
From: the non <myaddress@server.co>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy
Subject: Re: Do boylovers hurt boys? Yes, no, maybe ?
References: <myaddress-2FD609.21114316062007@news.easynews.com> <4nl083p4hhstv7dlobtmdhr1kfa904ci6n@4ax.com> <84u083dpdp55ts39tgbac21q1q69qjg3fe@4ax.com> <a5e383dkld3d9r8dgkhctlmiblao1o1dkd@4ax.com> <t9j383h4c7knmv2rdiirbsje6392975400@4ax.com> <2k1683pmt89asncgj10mgv3oefv08839ia@4ax.com> <s57683h1r6gn8211jlkbvd88idilpocp2g@4ax.com> <mkk883hb2sfvu0safv466cv8t2l2t2imb8@4ax.com> <11m883hg7hejvla9sgjm6j0a5o2p15roc5@4ax.com>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (PPC Mac OS X)
Message-ID: <myaddress-D10BF2.10191129062007@news.easynews.com>
Lines: 34
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:19:27 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy:175
X-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:35:33 UTC (s02-b63)
[snip]
>
> Thus, in accordance with The Non's statements, I conclude that
> boylovers--true, ethical boylovers--do not directly harm the boy.
> Society does the damage, and intentionally ... through the consensus
> of moral tyranny.
>
> Does the fact that Society imposes these rules demand that the ethical
> boylover acknowledge them and refrain from intimacy, knowing the
> possible ramifications? This is 4s00th's position.
How smart is it to conform to rules no one has voted on or otherwise
agreed to, 4s00th? Most of these 'rules' originated from the mouthings
of one illiterate or another many hundreds of years ago: why should
anyone think their "wisdom" is superior to anyone else's? Further, your
primitive societies, VV, were characterized by marital fidelity and no
crime!
A further comment on this digression: frequently I hear on the TV news
(Sky, EuroNews, BBC, etc), items about the shocking amount of bullying
in UK schools, something that appears to be endemic there, but not
necessarily elsewhere. That is the essence of different cultures. But,
unlike choosing the fable one wants to adhere to, one must up-sticks and
move to a better place when a culture/society becomes unacceptable.
>
> Or does the boylover ignore the rules?
>
> As to whether this might be "right" or "wrong", one perhaps should
> consider first other rules Society once believed were sacred and
> unbending, yet today are seen by the majority of that society as being
> backward, antiquated and cruel.
>
> Slavery comes to mind.
|
|
|