| Re: A Stunning Concession! |
EasyNews, UseNet made Ea .. |
| HMS Victor Victorian (VictorVictorian@NBG.com) |
2008/05/22 17:25 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!s02-b50!textbe01-phx!hwmnpeer02.phx!hw-filter.phx!hwmnpeer01.phx!hw-filter.lga!hwmnpeer01.lga!hwmpeer03.lga!news.highwinds-media.com!bigfeed2.bellsouth.net!news.bellsouth.net!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!easynews-local!fe10.news.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: HMS Victor Victorian <VictorVictorian@NBG.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy
Subject: Re: A Stunning Concession!
Message-ID: <v20c34hgugp2fmf0nninrd66athp0boq5q@4ax.com>
References: <ge8b34la5n9cqp8p3vrt8b49ckrl4grsgv@4ax.com> <Xns9AA75F2888BC1utb@208.90.168.18>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 44
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 23:25:22 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy:1544
X-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:54:45 UTC (s02-b50)
On Thu, 22 May 2008 23:17:29 +0000 (UTC), Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty>
wrote:
>HMS Victor Victorian <VictorVictorian@NBG.com> wrote in
>news:ge8b34la5n9cqp8p3vrt8b49ckrl4grsgv@4ax.com:
>
>> I am amazed that the most recently prolific antagonist has actually
>> made the following statement.
>>
>> [Begin direct quote]
>> "Yet your solution for the protection of children is to plaster their
>> nude
>> photos all over Usenet without their informed consent. You are not a
>> boylover
>> at all, are you." (note incorrect punctuation--ed)
>> [End direct quote]
>>
>> The conclusion is that, by heavens, children are capable of giving
>> "informed consent" or the statement would not have been couched in
>> such verbiage.
>>
>> Of course, the subsequent argument might revolve not around the term
>> "consent" but around the intent of term "informed." I have little
>> doubt as to how our dear protagonist will draw those parameters.
>>
>> Concurrently, given this statement, if posting pictures of nude
>> children without their "informed consent" is wrong ... indeed if not a
>> crime ... then such popular picture sites such as Webshots, Picasa,
>> Fotki, etc. are filled with perpetrators [the majority of them being
>> doting parents and relatives] guilty of the same ... literally
>> thousands of them.
>>
>> Where then should IWF begin? Quite a conundrum, to say the least.
>
>So you go to those websites to perv as well? Your infantile lust must have no
>limits.
Dissimilation.
So typical.
VV
God Save the Queen!
God Preserve the Prince of Wales!
Rule Britannia!
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|
|